Subtitled "So where's that blender about Epistomology?"
Hello all-
As a lurker and occasional leaper in frays herein, an open question,
re discussions that involve philosophy, perception, paradigms, etc:
> If the desire is to know and then to know more, to find things out
by asking and referring to others who have asked, why does the
conversation only draw from a particular tradition, generally
identifiable as western philosophical eurocentric thought ?
There is so much information, applicable and important to these
discussions from other areas of western science - neuroscience,
developmental biology, cognitive psychology, and more.
Then, of course, there is the entire rest of the world, with vast
fields of empirical investigation and scientific methodology in other
cultures and eras.
Those examinations themselves have influenced the discussion here,
whether you are aware of it in the moment or not. Humans everywhere
have been arguing about all this since we could communicate. Arguments
and philosophies arose, then traders and explorers would travel and
exchange ideas, and then the church somewhere would say no, which
galvanized others' interests, who then took the knowledge further...
Their jargon is as specialized as yours, but the desire to know, and
the areas explored, are the same.
The desire to understand these concepts seems to be a fundamental
human urge.
This is a genuine question, because I have spent a lifetime
investigating with great rigor the same questions you all discuss
here. I am driven to look everywhere for answers, since my goal is
knowledge of the world, and of myself in it. Limiting myself is not
intellectually defensible to me.
That youall, intelligent and educated persons, seem to contain your
investigations must have a reason.
If I know your reason, then my leaps into the fray here can be more
germane to your conversation and not just to my own (and perhaps to
those other lurkers who write, but do not 'send' as quickly as me).
I have attempted to phrase this in as non-judgemental a way as
possible: I am not interested in trying to exert my viewpoint, but to
understand your choice of platform for these discussions.
Thank you-
Tory
In philosophy, empiricism is a theory of knowledge which asserts that
knowledge arises from experience. Empiricism is one of several
competing views about how we know "things," part of the branch of
philosophy called epistemology, or "the Theory of Knowledge".
Empiricism emphasizes the role of experience and evidence,
especiallysensory perception, in the formation of ideas, while
discounting the notion of innate ideas (except in so far as these
might be inferred from empirical reasoning, as in the case of genetic
predisposition).[1]============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
