Perhaps an even better example is *emergence*. As Nick's reading group is in
the process of finding out, there have been (and in some circles still are)
lots of often incompatible and virtually meaningless definitions of that
term . But we didn't give up and it, and we now know what it means -- or
what we should use it to mean. What had been a mystery has been solved.

-- Russ_A



On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Russ Abbott <[email protected]> wrote:

> I didn't say I had a definition. In fact, I said that I was having a very
> hard time putting words to it. But does that mean that one should give up on
> it?  We can't do much with consciousness (or the term I prefer, subjective
> experience) either, but I'm not willing to dismiss it as virtually
> meaningless.
>
> Please remember that my participation in the discussion came after Eric,
> Miles, and Glen [one 'n'], seemed very dismissive of reality. That seemed
> quite strange to me. Our current inability to get our arms/head/words around
> something isn't automatically grounds to dismiss it. Most of what we have
> figured out about the world started out as very poorly formulated.
>
> -- Russ_A
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:14 AM, russell standish <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> You tell me. Just what is the notion? Reality could mean:
>>
>> 1) What kicks back. Johnson's stone, or Doug's hammered thumb
>> 2) Elementary particles
>> 3) Force Fields
>> 4) A universal dovetailer (Schmidhuber's Great Programmer)
>> 5) Platonia of mathematical forms
>> 6) Kant's noumenon
>> 7) Standish's Nothing (aka Library of Babel)
>> 8) Real in the sense I am real (RITSIAR)
>> ...
>>
>>
>> and that's just what I pulled out of my head in a brief moment. The
>> ... indicates that there are many, many, more subtle variants. Most of
>> these versions of reality are incompatible with each other.
>>
>> The truth is that the word reality has been debased so much it is
>> virtually meaningless, unless very carefully qualified.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:55:10PM -0700, Russ Abbott wrote:
>> > Just because someone uses a word nonsensically, does that make the word
>> > nonsense?
>> >
>> > I still don't get it. Why are so many people so anxious to dismiss the
>> word
>> > *reality *-- and with it the corresponding notion?
>> >
>> > -- Russ_A
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:38 PM, russell standish <
>> [email protected]>wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:36:18PM -0700, Russ Abbott wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > And it has nothing to do with whether there is a God. I don't
>> understand
>> > > the
>> > > > connection. Reality is. (That's the end of the previous sentence.)
>> God,
>> > > if
>> > > > there is any such thing, is by definition outside the realm of what
>> is.
>> > > And
>> > > > I say that because those who believe in God -- at least those who
>> are
>> > > > sophisticated about it -- are very careful to keep God away from any
>> sort
>> > > of
>> > > > empirical investigation or verification.
>> > > >
>> > > > -- RussA
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > The only connection is analogical. There's probably almost as many
>> > > conceptions of god as there are people on the planet. Similarly, there
>> > > seems to be about as many conceptions of reality. Consequently, both
>> > > terms are really superfluous to doing science.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
>> > > Mathematics
>> > > UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [email protected]
>> > > Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>> > >
>> > >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>>
>> > ============================================================
>> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
>> Mathematics
>> UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [email protected]
>> Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to