Not all people or cultures would agree that fame and lack of privacy =
lack of safety.
On Jul 14, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
Privacy is a curious thing, especially
those who do not have it - the rich
and the famous - desire it.
Those who have it - the poor and the
nameless - do not value it. They would
like to get rid of it if they can become
rich and famous.
Is it possible that some goals in Maslow's
hierarchy of needs contradict each other?
The need for self-actualization and achievement
leads to fame and lack of privacy, and this
implies a lack of safety. Or is it just the
modern media society which plays with
human emotions by creating and destroying
"stars" ?
-J.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Owen Densmore <o...@backspaces.net>
wrote:
I guess I agree with Scott McNealy: you don't have any privacy, get
used to
it!
-- Owen
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
