Hello gentlemen and ladies,

 

I have been off chasing the moon again but I have been drawn back to earth,

 

Sounds like an overworked story line, but with a curiously contemporary vein. I 
would hazard a guess you can turn this into a romp.

 

Might I suggest another twist to make it a bit more deliciously disturbing. ( I 
have a Slavic streak of Black Humor)

Your hero eventually has a problem with his surrogate devices, and discovers he 
is being poisoned/drugged. He has to discover why the justice system is having 
trouble  finding the unknown villain and then realizes that the justice system 
itself is divided on the definition of attempted murder or was it simply 
mechanical malfeasance. He thinks he is still human but there is serious 
disagreement in the public.

 

I agree the mind/body issue is over worked , the Human being versus non human 
intelligence is trickier. We could add to the melee a large number of 
recipients of artificial heart devices that are being declared dead because 
they no longer have a heart beat. So what is human and how do we define life. 
Human rights activists are unprepared for the debate as one side argues 
foetuses to be non human while possessing all the attributes  of bona fide 
human beings? It degenerates into a campaign where the prejudices of some 
People define who is and who is not human enough for protection.

 

I recall a disasterous argument I had once with a young female student when she 
asked if I was pro or con abortion. I said off handedly that society already 
tolerates an enormous amount of murder without blinking an eye and could see no 
difficulty expecting society to tolerate even more murder.

 

She then declared it was not in fact murder since it was simply a lump of 
flesh. Being a biologist as she wished to become, I asked “So what is this lump 
you call flesh?” She looked amazed at the question. “ Is it a snail, is it a 
dog maybe a tree, if it exists and has life what is it then?”  She withdrew in 
a huff and deprecating manner of body language. I then asked others that 
overheard the question, What is the problem with legally tolerated murder? Why 
does the change of name change the ethical status? Or does it? The evil we do 
is  given a new name and becomes a virtue. Perhaps the brain in the bottle 
loses such psychological trickery and has to live with the truth of events 
around himself. Then when he wishes to escape he has to find a means of 
committing suicide or can he ( a good literary device )? Put our hero on the 
Women’s talk show circuit and follow the body language. I would love to see a 
sketch of the hero in a two way debate with Anne Coulter, Michele Bachman or 
any other Right wingers?  Have the brain become a Blogger… commenting on 
humanity

 

I think the mind/body issue is deceptive. Since we think it purely self 
referential.  My nagging question is perhaps more important. Why do we need to 
dehumanize someone before we execute them? Why does a murderer strain logic to 
justify his acts to be other than what it is ? The mind/body debate hides much 
uncertainty about our intelligence , ethics morality and desires. Blaming the 
body strips us of free will. Our justice system assumes we are informed and 
competent when that may be seriously in doubt. I agree most people are deluded 
but the court system usually is aware of the fact and strictly deals with more 
bloody matters.

 

Somewhere lurking behind so many social situations is the problem of intent. 
The intent is transformed from murder to pest disposal and we all agree to use 
language to disguise the truth in that we create a society of corruption.  I 
think what your scenario for a novel prods at is that secret cognitive 
dissonance that allows a person to deform language and exonerate themselves  
from a crime. Does the Bottle brain still have the secret dissonance in place 
after the transformation.? Will he lie to himself about the nature of his past 
life? Perhaps he was a bogus war hero, tax evader or drug addict anything is 
possible?

 

What if the bottle brain now unable to deceive others or himself discovers his 
intellect to be a fiction? 

 

The scenario seems to be a good first chapter, now consider the brain to be the 
evil within us that we strive to reform through theatrical sincerity.

There is something about your scenario that reminds me of one of C.S.Lewis ‘ 
sci fi stories The title escapes me but perhaps it was “The Horror”

 

Bulgakov wrote a short story about a scientist who experimented on a dog to 
enhance its development. The result was a new form of Soviet era atrocity 
appearing human but acting beastly. He graduated to becoming a soviet style 
apparatchik. 

 

The scenario needs a Hook on the nature of being Human without all the flesh. 

 

Lovely notion seems there is a lot of territory to explore when you get 
rolling. I hope you drop us hints of what you struggle with in your new 
adventure.

In another offshoot it reminds me of getting older where society imposes on us 
a state of delegitimation or disenfranchisement.  Often I watch younger people 
assume that white hair means we are past prime and  no longer what we thought 
we were. I think it worth examining the beliefs of the young grad student who 
thought that a good argument and a nasty gaze could change murder into a virtue 
as if she had a special magical  wand. Is the issue of human rights really so 
trivial that one individual can strip another of protection because of a hidden 
desire?

Good luck.

 

 

Vladimyr Burachynsky.

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Steve Smith
Sent: September-17-11 9:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: The Psychology Of Yogurt

 

This reminds me too much of two disparate concepts:

SF Author (from ABQ no less) book "Proxies" where orphaned children with severe 
physical disabilities are offered an alternate existence by becoming 
telepresence operators of space equipment (cheaper than actually 
putting/keeping humans in space and a reasonable alternative for otherwise 
hugely physically limited children who can now have expanded sensoria and 
mobility but in an artificial habitat... raised as a family (of orphans), 
etc...   and all that goes with it utopian/dystopian SF Style.

    http://www.amazon.com/Proxies-Laura-J-Mixon/dp/0812523873

And the Honey Mummy ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mellified_man ) aka, the 
mellified man.   Not unlike a petrified tree but with a human and honey instead 
of tree and minerals.  Great source of all the necessary/appropriate vitamins 
and minerals, and tasty too!

- Steve



Nick,
I have been thinking recently about trying to write a short story. It would 
start with a version of Daniel Dennet's wonderful brain-in-a-vat. It would be a 
story of a valiant man who volunteered for the procedure; he volunteered for 
his love of science and the deep impact it would have on the most fundamental 
of questions, the relation of brain, mind, and body. There would be dual 
devices; the device in the head functioned to replicate effects at the surface 
of the brain and keep the space filled, the vat kept the brain alive, received 
input measures from the in-head device, and read any and all brain outputs. 
There would be details of how the vat perfectly replicates all effects the body 
would have on the brain, and how the artificial implant perfectly replicates 
all effects the brain would have on the body. All effects: Neuronal, hormonal, 
temperature, chemical force, everything - no safety for the body in a boxing 
ring or any other situation. And of course, our protagonist's heroism is 
rewarded. Mr. Brain-in-the-Vat functioned amazingly; he could move around, 
communicate, feel emotions, dream, everything. People came from miles around to 
wonder at him and get autographs ($15 extra for the paper to be signed on the 
vat). He was interviewed on every major TV show, and Larry Flynt even paid him 
a fortune for... being in film. 

But one day another man showed up on Daniel's doorstep. He too had volunteered 
for a brave experiment. Sitting next to him on the veranda was a vat that held 
his kidneys and perfectly replicated all effects the body would have on the 
kidneys, and inside him was a genius device that perfectly replicated all 
effects the kidneys would have on the brain. 

But everyone knew that would work, the kidneys after all are JUST a 
physiological system. And so, no one cared. 

---
Eric



On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 04:09 PM, "Nicholas Thompson"  
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:



I cannot … for the life of me …. Understand what the mind-body “problem” is any 
more than I can understand what the computing-transistor problem is (if, 
indeed, there are still transistors in computers.)  We would never wonder why a 
better transistor would make the computing better; why would we wonder why a 
better stomach would make the mind work better.   To me, the interesting 
psychological question is why people see it is a problem.  What is that they 
want to make of the mind that makes the mind-body problem a problem?

 

Nick 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Victoria Hughes
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 1:09 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] Fwd: The Psychology Of Yogurt

 

Probiotics, reduced anxiety, and thoughts about the weird, wrong perception 
that we exist separately from our bodies, somehow. 

 

 

Date: September 17, 2011 12:18:17 PM MDT

Subject: The Psychology Of Yogurt

Source: Wired Science » Frontal Cortex

Author: Jonah Lehrer

 

My latest WSJ  
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904265504576566820066488938.html>
 column uses a new study on probiotics as a launching pad to explore the 
mind-body problem, perhaps the most perplexing mystery in modern science:

One of the deepest mysteries of the human mind is that it doesn’t feel like 
part of the body. Our consciousness seems to exist in an immaterial realm, 
distinct from the meat on our bones. We feel like the ghost, not like the 
machine.

This ancient paradox—it’s known as the mind-body problem—has long perplexed 
philosophers. It has also interested neuroscientists, who have traditionally 
argued that the three pounds of our brain are a sufficient explanation for the 
so-called soul. There is no mystery, just anatomy.

In recent years, however, a spate of research has put an interesting twist on 
this old conundrum. The problem is even more bewildering than we thought, for 
it’s not just the coiled cortex that gives rise to the mind—it’s the entire 
body. As the neuroscientist Antonio Damasio writes, “The mind is embodied, not 
just embrained.”

The latest evidence comes from a new study of probiotic bacteria, the 
microorganisms typically found in yogurt and dairy products. While most 
investigations of probiotics have focused on their gastrointestinal 
benefits—the bacteria reduce the symptoms of diarrhea and irritable bowel 
syndrome—this new research explored the effect of probiotics on the brain.

The experiment, led by Javier Bravo at University College Cork in Ireland, was 
straightforward. First, he fed normal lab mice a diet full of probiotics. Then, 
Mr. Bravo’s team tested for behavioral changes, which were significant: When 
probiotic-fed animals were put in stressful conditions, such as being dropped 
into a pool of water, they were less anxious and released less stress hormone.

How did the food induce these changes? The answer involves GABA, a 
neurotransmitter that reduces the activity of neurons. When Mr. Bravo looked at 
the brains of the mice, he found that those fed probiotics had more GABA 
receptors in areas associated with memory and the regulation of emotions. (This 
change mimics the effects of popular antianxiety medications in humans.)

Furthermore, when he severed the nerve connecting the gut and brain in a 
control group of mice, these neural changes disappeared. The probiotic diet no 
longer relieved the symptoms of stress.

Though it might seem odd that a cup of yogurt can influence behavior, the 
phenomenon has been repeatedly confirmed, at least in rodents. Earlier this 
year, Swedish scientists showed that the presence of gut bacteria shapes the 
development of the mouse brain, while French researchers found that treating 
human subjects with large doses of probiotics for 30 days reduced levels of 
“psychological distress.” There’s nothing metaphorical about “gut feelings,” 
for what happens in the gut really does influence what we feel.

Nor is it just the gastrointestinal tract that alters our minds. Mr. Damasio 
has shown that neurological patients who are unable to detect changes in their 
own bodies, like an increased heart rate or sweaty palms, are also unable to 
make effective decisions. When given a simple gambling task, they behave 
erratically and lose vast sums of money. Because they can’t experience the 
fleshy symptoms of fear, they never learn from their mistakes.

This research shows that the immateriality of mind is a deep illusion. Although 
we feel like a disembodied soul, many feelings and choices are actually shaped 
by the microbes in our gut and the palpitations of our heart. Nietzsche was 
right: “There is more reason in your body than in your best wisdom.”

This doesn’t mean, of course, that the mind-body problem has been solved. 
Though scientists have ransacked our matter and searched everywhere inside the 
skull, they still have no idea why we feel like a ghost. But it’s now 
abundantly clear that the mind is not separate from the body, hidden away in 
some ethereal province of thought. Rather, we emerge from the very same stuff 
that digests our lunch.

If you’d like to learn about the microbiome lurking inside your pipes, I highly 
recommend this wonderful  
<http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/08/08/an-introduction-to-the-microbiome/>
 slideshow by Ed Yong.

Read more… 
<http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/09/the-psychology-of-yogurt/> 

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601



 
 
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to