I don't think I get it.

I looked at one of the videos, the second of two on work and energy in
the physics section, and 1) I don't see how this is somehow better
than a textbook treatment, and 2) it's not very good physics. I read
that all of the 2400 short videos have been produced by one person,
the head of the organization. This surely doesn't guarantee quality.

How is this progress?

Bruce

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Victoria Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Great teaching style, use of simple accessible graphics, and what, over 2400
> topics about math, science, finances, and more. Video format.
> http://www.khanacademy.org/
>
>
> Tory Hughes
> www.toryhughes.com
> Milagro Hacienda creativity retreat
> The Creative Development manual
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to