Doug, don't fret. The answer to Jochen's question is "Yes, it is about friggin time we get a good theory", and Andrew and Sabrina's blog is an excellent source of ideas for improving psychology. Recently Andrew's blog has been getting attention from other excellent professionals, including a Scientific American author who is actively discussing Andrew's previous post: "<http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.com/2011/11/embodied-cognition-is-not-what-you.html>". (With more discussion <http://fixingpsychology.blogspot.com/2011/11/embodied-cognition.html>.)
Roger, You are correct that it might seem like psychology should have other things to worry about, but frankly the problems you mention (rampant misuse of statistics and the rare forged data scandals) would be a lot easier to deal with if we had a more unified theoretical base. Eric On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 07:12 PM, Douglas Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, God. Here we go. > >On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jochen Fromm <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nick, Eric, what do you think, does Psychology need a theory? >> >> >http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.com/2011/11/theory-and-why-its-time-psychology-got.html?m=1 >> -J. >> >> Sent from Android >> ============================================================ >> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv >> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College >> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org >> > >============================================================ >FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv >Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College >lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > > > Eric Charles Professional Student and Assistant Professor of Psychology Penn State University Altoona, PA 16601
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
