Heh, :- ) Much of the problems in modern psychology arose, historically, because people studying the "physical sciences" thought they could escape the problems of dualism by foisting them off onto psychology. But use of scientific instruments in no way escapes the "subjective" "objective" problem, if such a problem exists. That is a very different conversation however.
Eric On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 03:21 PM, Marcos <stalkingt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jochen Fromm <j...@cas-group.net> wrote: >> Nick, Eric, what do you think, does Psychology need a theory? >> >> >http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.com/2011/11/theory-and-why-its-time-psychology-got.html?m=1 > >Why should psychology have a theory when it isn't even properly a >science? Science deals with the objective. As soon as it tries to >breach that barrier you get delusions grandeur. > >...Ducks... > >marcos >sf_x > >============================================================ >FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv >Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College >lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > > > Eric Charles Professional Student and Assistant Professor of Psychology Penn State University Altoona, PA 16601
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
