I doubt they'll be listening in on FRIAM, Tom.

:-/

--Doug

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Tom Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  [snip]
>
>  Hence, if we want to look for "advanced civilizations," it seems we
> should be looking for relatively quiet "white noise" sources . . .   :-)
>
> tom
>
>
>
> On Mar 31, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
>
> > A couple of comments:
> >
> > 1. Recent research shows that there are tens of billions of rocky
> planets inhabiting the habitable liquid water zone in our galaxy alone.  See
> >
> >
> http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-billions-rocky-planets-habitable-zones.html
> >
> > 2. Multicellular life started on earth about 540 million years ago
> >
> > 3.  250 million years ago the Mesozoic era began -- trees, dinosaurs
> >
> > 4. Homo Sap. has been around for maybe 100,000 years, or about
> 0.000000007% of the total time since the big bang.
> >
> > 5.  There are perhaps 200 billion galaxies in the observable universe,
> and nobody even knows if the diameter of the universe is 78 billion light
> years in diameter, or infinite.
> >
> > Given the above, I'd say the chances there this is life out there are
> considerably greater than the chances of winning the mega-millions lottery.
>  Whether any of that life evolves to the point of developing what we might
> call intelligence before catastrophe intervenes is an interesting question.
>  There have been 5 mass extinctions on earth:
> >
> >       • The first great mass extinction event took place at the end of
> the Ordovician, when according to the fossil record, 60% of all genera of
> both terrestrial and marine life worldwide were exterminated.
> >       • 360 million years ago in the Late Devonian period, the
> environment that had clearly nurtured reefs for at least 13 million years
> turned hostile and the world plunged into the second mass extinction event.
> >       • The fossil record of the end Permian mass extinction reveals a
> staggering loss of life: perhaps 80–95% of all marine species went extinct.
> Reefs didn't reappear for about 10 million years, the greatest hiatus in
> reef building in all of Earth history.
> >       • The end Triassic mass extinction is estimated to have claimed
> about half of all marine invertebrates. Around 80% of all land quadrupeds
> also went extinct.
> >       • The end Cretaceous mass extinction 65 million years ago is
> famously associated with the demise of the dinosaurs. Virtually no large
> land animals survived. Plants were also greatly affected while tropical
> marine life was decimated. Global temperature was 6 to 14°C warmer than
> present with sea levels over 300 metres higher than current levels. At this
> time, the oceans flooded up to 40% of the continents.
> >
> > Were it not for that last one, intelligent life on earth might be
> sauron-based, rather than (arguably) hominid-based.  However, having
> observed that the demonstrated proven benefits of intelligence on earth
> include religion, religious war, a fascination with building enough nuclear
> weapons to guarantee another mass extinction event, and a propensity for
> breeding beyond the capacity of the planet to supply food and water for a
> rapidly growing population of billions, I'd say that the odds were pretty
> good that we won't be around to meet another intelligence, should one ever
> happen to come looking this way.
> >
> > However, if you are a Sarah Palin or Rick Santorum or Rick Perry-class
> creationist, please ignore all of the above.  Humans and dinosaurs were
> happily co-existing from the beginning, 6,000 years ago, and God made us in
> his image, and we are the chosen. Which makes the whole question of other
> intelligence completely immaterial.
> >
> > If you are a Mitt Romney-class Mormon, you may pass directly on to
> Kolub; the issue of intelligent life is obviously of no meaning to you.
> >
> > --Doug
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I got to thinking a bit more about an assumption I (and I bet most of
> us) have held, that surely there is "intelligent" life on other planets,
> one capable of technology .. thus SETI's radio search. Surely it is hubris
> to claim humanity is somehow unique, just look at the diversity of our own
> world! Thus there's got to be lots of intelligent life out there, right?
> > >
> > > (Yes, I know, this is pretty vague, and we're intelligent only for
> very small values of intelligent.)
> > >
> > > But listening to a TED by Hawking, I was impressed with his somewhat
> measured approach: that we have not found a radio source within 200-400
> light years.  I believe his choice of distance had to do with our own
> development of radio a couple of centuries ago.
> > >
> > > That got me reading up on just how long we've been around, and how
> long other civilizations could have existed.  Very roughly speaking, the
> big bang was 14 billion years ago, our sun is 4.5 billion years old, and
> the earth is 4 billion years old.
> > >
> > > Well, that sounds like we're late to the game: 4 billion years old in
> a universe 14 billion years old.  But wait a minute, we know we're the
> result of star-stuff, the heavy elements.  The big bang was only able to
> muster nuclei of fairly low weight, lithium say .. possibly a bit more.
>  The first generation of stars, therefor were fairly odd, huge and short
> lived.  And the second generation of stars were less heavy element rich
> than our sun, which makes it at best third generation. http://goo.gl/gV54S
> > >
> > > So given only 14BY for building solar systems, and assuming the
> requirement for an at least third generation sun, we may be as young as
> likely a life form possible.
> > >
> > > So SETI is likely playing a loosing game, we're young enough that the
> statistics may be that, yes there is life out there, but it's pretty young
> too and maybe is no more advanced than we are. (Maybe that is Hawking's
> couple of centuries limit)  Of course we're talking about a few centuries,
> which would make a huge difference in technology, but still.
> > >
> > > Hawking does end with a grim comment others have made: maybe
> civilizations are short lived .. they self destruct or fall prey to
> destructive events (meteors, comets).
> > >
> > >    -- Owen
> > >
> > > ============================================================
>
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to