I absolutely agree with you. Drew Weston often has intelligent things to
say about Obama's failure to communicate. Here's his most
recent<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen/obama-tax-cut_b_1660814.html>.
 And while I'm posting links, Robert Reich makes the
point<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/obama-tax-proposal_b_1661908.html>that
extending the tax cuts for income up to $250,000 applies to everyone,
even those making more than $250,000. It's not that the tax cuts apply only
to those making less; they apply to *everyone*. This is not class warfare.
It treats everyone the same way. Obama should make that point also.

*-- Russ *

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Russ Abbott <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Well, it's Barack Obama vs. Gordon Gekko.  Which would you prefer to see
>> as president? Perhaps the country is waking up to that.
>>
>> *-- Russ Abbott*
>>
>
> Like many of us, I wanted Obama to be the president "for the rest of us".
>  But he's seemed weak in many aspects of his presidency.  I realize that
> many presidential historians believe "exogenous" events form a president,
> not their platform or promises.  Much of the downturn was inherited. But as
> bad as the hand he was dealt was, he could at least articulate the positive
> things he has done.
>
> Obama has had several successes, quite important ones.  But he never
> explains them to the electorate.  Instead he gets mauled by the opposition.
>  Why is he so poor at explaining his successes?
>
> A trivial example is the health care bill.  Yes it is a "tax", but overall
> it will vastly reduce taxes due to the relief it brings caused by
> "freeloaders" who use the most expensive health care possible: the
> emergency room!  Several pundits have claimed as much as a 10 to one
> reduction in public costs which will be reflected in lower taxes.
>
> But Obama remains mum.  I don't get it.
>
> It could simply be the media, which loves a good fight.  They fan the
> flames and nurture fear.  But it does seem to me that a large amount of the
> (idiotic) electorate buys the anti-obama rhetoric.
>
> I (think) Obama would be the best outcome, at least he's got experience at
> it and could be better in a second term.  And Romney does seem a bit of an
> ass.  I am, however, surprised at the difference between the graph and the
> punditry.
>
>    -- Owen
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to