Owen -

*I* get it.... he doesn't have to articulate it.. he merely has to make (a lot) more sense, totally exposed by his behaviour, than the afore mentioned "Gordon Gecko" that is the "other party"... I would love it if Obama would follow up his "citizen-funded" win of 2008 with a total silence in 2012... let the 'publicans bury themselves with their own rhetoric.

Yes, if you are the gay couple who didn't get his full endorsement for your wedding or if your child didnt get withdrawn from Afghanistan as quickly as you wanted, or if you wanted (who doesn't?) Gitmo shut down 4 years ago, then OK... vote for the "other guy". But really?

Obama has us by the short hairs... he (should) know(s) that he beats the (holy) shit out of the alternative... he's not MY answer, but he's a "damn good start"!

I don't need Obama to articulate anything to me... if *I* don't know what the score is, his telling me doesn't change anything. I say his lack of attendance to our BS needs for spoon feeding our needs... is his genius...

But I could be wrong...

- Steve
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Russ Abbott <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Well, it's Barack Obama vs. Gordon Gekko.  Which would you prefer
    to see as president? Perhaps the country is waking up to that.
    /-- Russ Abbott/


Like many of us, I wanted Obama to be the president "for the rest of us". But he's seemed weak in many aspects of his presidency. I realize that many presidential historians believe "exogenous" events form a president, not their platform or promises. Much of the downturn was inherited. But as bad as the hand he was dealt was, he could at least articulate the positive things he has done.

Obama has had several successes, quite important ones. But he never explains them to the electorate. Instead he gets mauled by the opposition. Why is he so poor at explaining his successes?

A trivial example is the health care bill. Yes it is a "tax", but overall it will vastly reduce taxes due to the relief it brings caused by "freeloaders" who use the most expensive health care possible: the emergency room! Several pundits have claimed as much as a 10 to one reduction in public costs which will be reflected in lower taxes.

But Obama remains mum.  I don't get it.

It could simply be the media, which loves a good fight. They fan the flames and nurture fear. But it does seem to me that a large amount of the (idiotic) electorate buys the anti-obama rhetoric.

I (think) Obama would be the best outcome, at least he's got experience at it and could be better in a second term. And Romney does seem a bit of an ass. I am, however, surprised at the difference between the graph and the punditry.

   -- Owen


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to