The plot thickens: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120828225612963
The jury foreman describes (in a youtubed interview) his solution to the "prior art" problems which consumed the first day of jury deliberations: the prior art didn't run on the same processor as Apple's art, so it couldn't be prior art! Once he'd persuaded the rest of the jury of this doubly wrong (doesn't matter which, if any, processor the prior art runs on, and Apple's phones do run on the same ARM processors as Samsung's) misinterpretation, the rest of the verdict was a piece of cake. There was an interview with Walter Isaacson on CSPAN last night about the biography, Steve Jobs, Apple, etc. Very worth watching if you get a chance. -- rec --
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
