Ugh. But can you appeal the thinking of a jury? On Aug 29, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> The plot thickens: > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120828225612963 > > The jury foreman describes (in a youtubed interview) his solution to the > "prior art" problems which consumed the first day of jury deliberations: the > prior art didn't run on the same processor as Apple's art, so it couldn't be > prior art! Once he'd persuaded the rest of the jury of this doubly wrong > (doesn't matter which, if any, processor the prior art runs on, and Apple's > phones do run on the same ARM processors as Samsung's) misinterpretation, the > rest of the verdict was a piece of cake. > > There was an interview with Walter Isaacson on CSPAN last night about the > biography, Steve Jobs, Apple, etc. Very worth watching if you get a chance. > > -- rec -- > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
