On 1/15/13 10:54 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
Who do we become when we do not respect the boundaries of others? Who
are we as a society when we allow or encourage others to transgress? I
understand the arguments for Law Enforcement and Intelligence and
Security *wanting* to spy on people freely... to restrict the use of
cryptography, etc. but they don't outweigh the risk of who we become
when we do these things.
When a person visits the doctor, information shared is privileged. If
the doctor does not treat it as such, the doctor's career is put at
risk. It's a good incentive to keep quiet.
So imagine a world in which brain scans become much more sophisticated,
and that certain dangerous mental health problems could be diagnosed
with high accuracy, and also treated. Because of fear of mass
shootings, etc., Americans make it law that scans be done on all, and
that appropriate treatments be employed. For the sake of argument,
suppose it's all handled methodically and in a secure fashion.
Should we expect that the therapists and psychiatrists involved in this
hypothetical process would suffer themselves for not respecting
boundaries of individuals' psychological spaces? In current practice
they would be invited inside the boundary by the patient and so
presumably that's different. I think it is an adjustment health
providers would make without much trouble. It would be a professional
analytical activity.
Marcus
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
