Doug,  

 

I want to participate in your anti-discussion discussion, but I cannot
master the facebook link.  Each time I click on it it invites me to create a
gmail account (which I already have, but do not use).  It won't let me link
to the old account.  So, I start another one.  And then, somehow, I never
get to the link you are offering me. So I do it again, and accumulate
another gmail account.  I am up to about six, now, and getting weary. 

 

So, unless you can use words (rather than links), I will have to watch from
afar.  God knows, that probably wouldn't be a bad thing.  

 

Nick 

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Douglas Roberts
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 9:16 AM
To: Stephen Guerin; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Presented for FRIAMic Consideration

 

Fuggit, work can wait, the first proposal is in final edit and the second
one is under control, so why delay my response.

 

Re: your question of what do I find ridiculous: Not the subject of the
referenced paper, certainly.  Rather our little group's pronounced tendency
to niggle and (dare I say it?) pontificate over the true, deep, and (dare I
say it?) philosophical meanings of words.  Like, say, just to pick a random
sample:  "emergence", "complex", "behaviors", "through", "causal",
"entropic", and "forces".


And now to hijack my own thread: the referenced paper mentions cosmology as
one of the topic ares that the above terms are frequently used to describe.
Since cosmology is one of my favorite spare time reading focus areas, I
wanted to make an observation that the following reference makes very
clearly, which is that nobody has even the slightest glimmer of
understanding of our true cosmological origins.  Even the events after that
instant of the big bang, where it is postulated that our universe expanded
from sub-atomic dimensions, through inflation (inflation? WTF caused that?)
are only sparsely understood. 

 

Classical physicists like to duck the subject of "What caused the big bang?"
by hiding behind the academic artifice of claiming that the question is
meaningless because space-time did not exist before the big bang.

 

But, we do like to pontificate here on FRIAM, don't we?  Deeply, and
philosophically. But rather than continuing in the usual vein of debating
(deeply, but with much pontification) the true meaning, of, say "emergence"
again, let's take the discussion in a new direction.  Sorry for the Facebook
link, but the original article is buried behind a NewScientist paywall.  The
article nicely addresses my thoughts on that other question you asked me,
i.e. where do I think life comes from.

 

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=501821756549668
<https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=501821756549668&set=a.4778929022758
87.114170.334816523250193&type=1&theater>
&set=a.477892902275887.114170.334816523250193&type=1&theater

 

 

--TrollBoi

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Stephen Guerin <[email protected]>
wrote:

Ok Troll-Boy, I'll bite.

 

Here's the paper referenced in the phys.org post:

  http://www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.pdf

 

Are these concepts so foreign that you hope to watch a thread thrash on the
semantics and meanings of this theoretical worldview? Is there something in
Hewitt's paper that strikes you as ridiculous, hogwosh or complexity babble?

 

The ideas in the paper restate what is obvious to many of the practitioners
on this list. Namely that structure formation and origin of life may well be
best understood as nature's response to imposed non-equilibrium gradients.
To many this is a core idea of Complexity. This mechanism has been linked as
a causal mechanism for the emergence of autonomous intelligent emergent
behavior since (1980, Kugler, Kelso and Turvey
<http://web.haskins.yale.edu/Reprints/HL0297.pdf> ), (2000 Kauffman
<http://www.amazon.com/Investigations-Stuart-A-Kauffman/dp/0195121058/ref=sr
_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1366685204&sr=8-2&keywords=investigations> ), (2005 Jun and
Hubler <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545530/>  and 2011
Hubler et al
<http://icmt.illinois.edu/workshops/fluctuations2011/Talks/Hubler_Alfred_ICM
T_May_2011.pdf> ) and (2007 Morowitz and Smith
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cplx.20191/abstract> ) among
others.

 

I haven't actually seen the software "entropica" referenced in the paper and
the claims may be a little over stated but the core ideas you quote
"emergence", "complex", "behaviors", "through", "causal" "entropic", and
"forces" are not new and strike me as matter of fact.

 

These same ideas have thrashed on the list almost exactly 10 years ago:

  http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.region.new-mexico.santa-fe.friam/256

 

Doug, where do you think intelligent behavior (ie life) comes from? Do you
have a view?  a pet theory? too busy?

 

--- -. .   ..-. .. ... ....   - .-- ---   ..-. .. ... ....

[email protected]

1600 Lena St #D1, Santa Fe, NM 87505

office: (505) 995-0206 <tel:%28505%29%20995-0206>  tollfree: (888) 414-3855
<tel:%28888%29%20414-3855> 

mobile: (505) 577-5828 <tel:%28505%29%20577-5828>   fax: (505) 819-5952
<tel:%28505%29%20819-5952>    

tw: @redfishgroup  skype: redfishgroup  gvoice: (505) 216-6226
<tel:%28505%29%20216-6226> 

redfish.com <http://redfish.com/>   |  simtable.com <http://simtable.com/> 

 

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Douglas Roberts <[email protected]>
wrote:

http://phys.org/news/2013-04-emergence-complex-behaviors-causal-entropic.htm
l

 

It is with much anticipation that we await the detailed discussions that are
sure to follow which will cover the meanings of "emergence", "complex",
"behaviors", "through", "causal" "entropic", and "forces".

 

--Doug

 

-- 

Doug Roberts
[email protected]

 <http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins>
http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins


505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com





 

-- 

Doug Roberts
[email protected]

 <http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins>
http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins


505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to