On 7/15/13 9:59 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
Nobody I ever worked with who had various high clearances seemed to be
able to acknowledge that their honor might *require* them to break
their oath? Is it that hard of a concept or did they not understand
the nature of "honor" in the first place?
No one is going to go on the record over a subjective concept like
honor. They're probably afraid to respond if the question is posed in
non-specific way and they aren't sure if its treatment would be clearly
treated by classification rules; they don't want people to get the
impression they don't take it seriously.
Marcus
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
