Marcus G. Daniels wrote at 07/17/2013 11:42 AM: > On 7/17/13 12:19 PM, Gary Schiltz wrote: >> Agreed, but we could form an alliance with them on issues on which we agree.
This goes back to the comment someone (Steve, I think) made about whether or not you really want your social network to include some of the people it actually includes. ;-) One of the reasons I stopped (blanketly) calling myself a libertarian was because of all the ... hm, what can I call them ... non-libertarians calling themselves libertarians. I don't want to be associated with them, much less allied. > A certain Australian electro house band would be a catchy name amongst the Tea > Party folks (or the Domestic Terrorist Party depending on your politics) as > well > as the club-going young people. I don't dare spell it out for sake of the > humor-impaired that might be reading! Hint: Julius Caesar. Allright. It's killing me. You have to provide another hint. Or rot13() it. That way anyone who might be offended will have time to cool off. [grin] -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella We like to keep it on the D.L. because our clientele prefers it that way ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
