No more Mister Nice Google, it's all going to be random noise from here on
out.

-- rec --


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Marcus G. Daniels <[email protected]>wrote:

>  On 11/6/13, 5:30 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
>
>  I think the inter-mail-server hops are encrypted, or I certainly hope
> so!  And the clients all support encryption or alternatively use https
> web-apps.
>
> Some providers use more lighter protocols like LMTPA (Local Mail Transfer
> Protocol) for internal transfers.   The idea being that if the mail doesn't
> hit the internet then the physical security of the ISP is sufficient, even
> though the ISP switches over to TLS security for the delivery once the data
> is headed for the internet.  And Google does the latter.  But for Google
> their internal network is world spanning, and delegated off to other
> companies fiber infrastructure.   Question is, does Google have a fastpath
> for gmail-to-gmail deliveries that does not use any encryption?  According
> to the leaked slides, the NSA was busy deconstructing the Google and Yahoo
> internal protocols, so they must have thought it would be profitable.  (And
> Google engineers say that the slides indeed reveal proprietary information.)
>
> Marcus
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to