Yes.  I agree.  We might get into trouble later regarding understandings of 
rich, but mostly it's true.  It tends to be less true in hunter gatherer groups 
where less dominant males tend to gang up and control their more successful 
colleagues.  See Boehm's Democracy in the Forest.  I think that's it.  But  
ever since it became possible to store grains, sendentary societies have tended 
to be dominated by people who can corner the storeable resources.  

In short let's go on.  

(I am puzzled why you and Marcus seem to feel that any attempt to nail down our 
understandings of essential words is bad form or counter-productive, but we 
don't have to discuss that here or now.) 

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 2:22 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] right vs left

On 01/10/2014 12:43 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> Well, we have started.  But I don't think we have made a good start.  I would 
> like to be arguing about something  about which we agree there is probably a 
> "truth of the matter."  Now that might violate some libertarian's (or at 
> least some postmodernists) principles from the start.  Given that I am a 
> classic silver spoon (well, at least Ikea flatware) bleeding-heart liberal, 
> are there any questions, concerning which you think there is a Truth of the 
> Matter, that you would like to argue about.  Or do your values tell you that 
> all opinions are “just” opinions?

Although Marcus' response was harsh, it was right.  But I'll try to play anyway.

I propose this Truth of the Matter:

   The world is run by rich people and has always been run by rich people.

Now, there's plenty to argue about, there, some of it semantic (what does 
"rich" mean, what does "run" mean, etc.).  And there should be plenty of 
evidence to cite to help decide whether it's reasonable or not.  I don't 
particularly _want_ to argue about this.  I think it's obviously true, but am 
willing to admit my ignorance and will gladly change my mind.

If we end up agreeing that it's basically true, then maybe we can move on.

--
⇒⇐ glen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to