Gary, You are correct. You must not get your mail in HTML, because there was a link in my message to the Wikipedia entry on Open Access Mandate. Google it.
N Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology Clark University http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ -----Original Message----- From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary Schiltz Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:55 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Access Publication Regarding OA mandates, which I assume stands for "Open Access" mandates, I believe some funding agencies require that papers that result from research funded by the agency (at least when the actual writing about the results is funded by the grant) be made open access. Just a vague memory, so take it with a grain of salt. Gary On Apr 16, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Nick Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Friammers, > > I thought Stevan Harnad's response might interest the Open Access Publication enthusiasts on this list. Perhaps we could talk about it on Friday: I am wondering what is meant by OA mandates. > > From: Stevan Harnad <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Research Gate? > Date: April 15, 2014 at 10:19:56 AM EDT > To: Nick Thompson <[email protected]> > Cc: CC suppressed by NST > > On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:52 AM, Nick Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Dr. Harnad, > > I have been watching the development of Research Gate with bemusement. On the on hand it seems like another attempt make money off of academic vanity, but on the other hand it seems to be awfully good at pulling materials into the quasi=public domain. > > I am betting you have strong opinions about them, and I am wondering what those are. > > Nick Thompson (etc.) > > Dear Professor Thompson, > > Research Gate has managed to use some effective lures to get people to make their papers OA (mostly vanity indicators), but it does not scale. The same authors who do not make their papers OA in their IRs (unless it is made mandatory) don't upload them to RG. And RG is vulnerable to take-down notices as a 3rd-party publisher. > > What would be useful (and will probably happen, though too slowly) would be if universities used the automated lure/vanity techniques of RG (as well as those of the https://www.openaccessbutton.org they could even set up automatic google-scholar alerts ) for their own institutional authors as a carrot to back up their OA mandates. > > But even that is useless without the mandates themselves... > > Best wishes, > > Stevan > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe > at St. John's College to unsubscribe > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
