Whether that would help or not is questionable.
See:
http://www.fairvote.org/research-and-analysis/presidential-elections/congressional-and-presidential-primaries-open-closed-semi-closed-and-top-two/
http://www.unifiedprimary.org/faq#question_id_22
But, again, hyper-focus on how we vote is probably no better than
hyper-focus on how campaigns are funded. If only there were some way we
could compose multiple mechanisms into some magic machine and, oh I
don't know, run it forward to see how it all works out, then compare
that machine to data taken from the world and tweak the machine until it
seems to work, then base our predictions off that machine. [sigh]
Sounds like science fiction to me!
On 07/01/2014 04:27 PM, Gillian Densmore wrote:
I say that ask I have a history of voting indipendent-I don't want to
squander my vote But I don't want have to choose coke or coke light,
sometimes herbal tea would be better and sometimes not just any ol
herbal tea, mint tea (for example)
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Gillian Densmore <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm wondering if where the issue comes from is my choice always
being Red or Blue. I can't help but wonder: If the US somehow were
to change over to a parilimentarysk system would that help
--
⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella
And I know I ain't digging on your lies
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
