This weeks Bill Stewart opinion piece in the New Mexican discusses the
Kurds fighting without support from Turkey: http://goo.gl/PNRTLv

​Turkey has three specific requirements before they join, all based on
their view that defeating ISIS would hand Assad a victory.

​1 - ​The establishment of a buffer zone​, at least several miles deep,​​
​in Syria along the Turkish border, to which many of the more than 3
million Syrian refugees in Turkey could return.
​2 - ​​A no-fly zone over the buffer area.
​3 - ​​Massive support for anti-Assad forces in Syria, something the U.S.
has been loathe to consider because of uncertainty over which Syrian rebel
hands would wind up with U.S. weapons.


​So, does this match any of the classic game theory paradoxes?

The situation seems to be deadlock.  I have to say Turkey's three
requirements make sense.  But I'm sure there are leaks.​  I think 3) for
example, is impossible to define .. it would include ISIS!

​   -- Owen

​In case there is a login required, here's the article:​


The Kurds continue fight without support


PrintCreate a hardcopy of this page
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/local_columns/the-kurds-continue-fight-without-support/article_63fe5574-ae87-5186-a79f-b04a6e6b62d9.html?mode=print>Font
Size:Default font size
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/content/tncms/live/#>Larger font size
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/content/tncms/live/#>
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/content/tncms/live/#>1
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/content/tncms/live/#>
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/local_columns/the-kurds-continue-fight-without-support/article_63fe5574-ae87-5186-a79f-b04a6e6b62d9.html?mode=image&photo=0>

BILL STEWART

*Understanding Your World*

Posted: Friday, October 10, 2014 7:00 pm | *Updated: 11:49 pm, Fri Oct 10,
2014.*

Bill Stewart | 1 comment
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/local_columns/the-kurds-continue-fight-without-support/article_63fe5574-ae87-5186-a79f-b04a6e6b62d9.html#user-comment-area>

The struggle for the Kurdish stronghold of Kobani continues, with no end in
sight. Kobani, or Ayn al Arab, as it is called in Arabic, sits along the
border with Turkey, where Turkish armed forces maintain a powerful watch
but so far have refused to move. Turkey has declined to intervene, and
without such action, almost all observers say, the city will fall to the
murderous forces of the Islamic State, giving it firm control of a long
stretch of the Turkish-Syrian border.

The collapse of Kobani has been delayed by repeated airstrikes carried out
by U.S. and coalition aircraft, but the fall of Kobani cannot be prevented
without the intervention of ground troops. And at this point in the
conflict, intervention means Turkey. The Turks, in the meantime, note that
America watched for two weeks as Kobani was shelled by the Islamic State
before the U.S. launched airstrikes. The Turks are not impressed.

So why has Turkey hung back, when so much is at stake? The question is at
once difficult and complex. Turkey has some 70 million people, and more
than 10 million are Kurds, a Sunni Muslim minority whose homeland forms a
substantial part of eastern Turkey as well as parts of Iraq, Iran and
Syria. They were promised their own country in the wake of World War I and
the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, but it never materialized.

Constant clashes, amounting to low-level warfare, have taken place between
Turks and Kurds in the past 90 years or so, and Iraq’s Saddam Hussein
killed tens of thousands of Kurds following the first Gulf War in 1991.
Nevertheless, a semiautonomous Kurdish state was established in
northeastern Iraq under Anglo-American air cover in the wake of the first
Gulf War. This Kurdish state has flourished and is everything the U.S.
would like to see happen in Iraq, of which Kurdistan is still legally a
part. The armed forces of Kurdistan are the Peshmerga, essentially a
guerrilla force but still the most effective fighting force facing the
Islamic State, also called ISIS. It is the Peshmerga that has stalled but
not stopped the ISIS forces, in large part because the Peshmerga is
outnumbered and outgunned. Moreover, many of the Kurdish fighters have long
been regarded by both Turkey and the U.S. as terrorists.

Because of this contentious and often bloody history, Turkey is reluctant
to get involved in a struggle that would see Kurdish forces emerge
victorious, even though Turkey itself wishes to see the defeat of the
Islamic State and its army. Even more than defeating ISIS, however, Turkey
wants to see the end of Syria’s Bashar Assad.

By defeating ISIS without first defeating the Syrian regime would, in
Turkey’s view, hand Assad a victory that Turkey is not about to
countenance. This is why Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has
insisted on three conditions before he commits his forces: The first is the
establishment of a buffer zone in Syria along the Turkish border, to which
many of the more than 3 million Syrian refugees in Turkey could return. How
much of the 500-mile-long Turkish border would be included is not clear,
but presumably it would be a buffer zone at least several miles deep to be
effective. That, in turn, would require his second condition be met — a
no-fly zone over the buffer area. And finally, there would need to be
massive support for anti-Assad forces in Syria, something the U.S. has been
loathe to consider because of uncertainty over which Syrian rebel hands
would wind up with U.S. weapons.

Turkey may be forgiven if it feels itself to be in the catbird’s seat. No
other country at this point is prepared to put troops on the ground, though
the Jordanians, caught in the middle as they are, could be tempted. The
U.S., too, might be tempted, because Washington is appalled at the idea of
an Islamic State. One deficiency in the airstrikes against ISIS is that
there is so little air-ground target coordination. This means airstrikes
are far less effective than they could be.

It may well be that the U.S. is considering the covert deployment of
Special Forces to Iraq and Syria to remedy the situation But this is risky.
In the short run, troops on the ground means Turkish troops. Who else is
there? Next in line would be a revitalized Iraqi army, so badly let down by
former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. But that deployment would take
time. In the meantime, Turkish troops stand silently along their border.
What will it take for President Erdogan to give the order? Thousands of the
remaining residents in Kobani anxiously await his decision. As do we in
America.

Bill Stewart writes about current affairs from Santa Fe. He is a former
U.S. Foreign Service officer and was a Time magazine correspondent.
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to