Glen, I was not trying to inhibit anyone. I was trying to tease about the fact that no matter how interesting something is to one person, that same thing is likely to be a bore to someone else. And therefore, there should be NO guidelines in friam, other than the politeness, kindness, and forbearance that have been shown me in abundance.
Nick Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology Clark University http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ -----Original Message----- From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of glen Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 4:50 PM To: Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: [FRIAM] appropriate content for FRIAM On 08/13/2015 10:19 AM, Nick Thompson wrote: > I apologize for this REPLY TO ALL error. I was actually reaching out to Owen > about an old private argument concerning what was appropriate for FRIAM. I > hope you all will forgive me. Well, private discussions are one thing. But, I would very much appreciate some guidelines on what was [in]appropriate content for the mailing list. It's probably obvious that I have no social skills and, hence, no ability to infer what's [in]appropriate. Being relatively free with the thread collapse and delete buttons, I can end up pretty biased toward the things that interest me, which runs the risk of crossing the [in]appropriateness boundary. -- ⇔ glen ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
