Nick,

Rest assured, all your posts are well within the ethereal boundaries.

That said, any future posting of neo-darwinist-inspired evolutionary
psychology logic will be considered bad aesthetic form ;-p

-S

--- -. .   ..-. .. ... ....   - .-- ---   ..-. .. ... ....
[email protected]
1600 Lena St #D1, Santa Fe, NM 87505
office: (505) 995-0206  mobile: (505) 577-5828
tw: @redfishgroup  skype: redfishgroup
redfish.com  |  simtable.com

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, glen <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 08/13/2015 10:19 AM, Nick Thompson wrote:
>
>> I apologize for this REPLY TO ALL error.  I was actually reaching out to
>> Owen about an old private argument concerning what was appropriate for
>> FRIAM.  I hope you all will forgive me.
>>
>
> Well, private discussions are one thing.  But, I would very much
> appreciate some guidelines on what was [in]appropriate content for the
> mailing list.  It's probably obvious that I have no social skills and,
> hence, no ability to infer what's [in]appropriate.  Being relatively free
> with the thread collapse and delete buttons, I can end up pretty biased
> toward the things that interest me, which runs the risk of crossing the
> [in]appropriateness boundary.
>
> --
> ⇔ glen
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to