Do you mean the Quail Run golf course, there ... in the desert? 8^)  If so, I can't imagine any 2 people in 
that changing room there, have it so "bad".  I feel kinda the same way about the ... [cough] ... 
militia members at Malheur.  How bad can it be if these Yeehawdists have plenty of free time and $$ for gas, 
guns, and such to seize and squat?  I know some people who have it "bad" and they certainly don't 
have that level of resources available to them.  It reminds me of the Tea Party people, <stereotype> 
overweight with their lawn furniture and misspelled signs</stereotype>.  What, precisely, do these people 
have to complain about?

But that makes the issue decidely _on_ topic, I think.  From the DSM 5, which doesn't 
seem to contain "amok":

1. Cultural syndrome is a cluster or group of co-occurring, relatively 
invariant symptoms
found in a specific cultural group, community, or context (e.g., ataque de 
nervios). The
syndrome may or may not be recognized as an illness within the culture (e.g., 
it might
be labeled in various ways), but such cultural patterns of distress and 
features of illness
may nevertheless be recognizable by an outside observer.

2. Cultural idiom of distress is a linguistic term, phrase, or way of talking 
about suffering
among individuals of a cultural group (e.g., similar ethnicity and religion) 
referring to
shared concepts of pathology and ways of expressing, communicating, or naming 
es­
sential features of distress (e.g., kufiingisisa). An idiom of distress need 
not be associated
with specific symptoms, syndromes, or perceived causes. It may be used to 
convey a
wide range of discomfort, including everyday experiences, subclinical 
conditions, or
suffering due to social circumstances rather than mental disorders. For 
example, most
cultures have common bodily idioms of distress used to express a wide range of 
suf­
fering and concerns.

3. Cultural explanation or perceived cause is a label, attribution, or feature 
of an explanatory
model that provides a culturally conceived etiology or cause for symptoms, 
illness, or
distress (e.g., maladi moun). Causal explanations may be salient features of 
folk classi­
fications of disease used by laypersons or healers.




On 01/04/2016 10:23 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
Slightly off-topic, but the mention of Malheur reminded me of a conversation in 
the men's changing room yesterday at Quail Run.

The Big Short started the discussion, and one guy said ".. but you can't trust 
anybody anymore, and the government is worst of all! Why aren't most of the bankers who 
caused the Financial Crisis in jail?".

This prompted another guy to say: "the only honest guys running for president are Trump and 
Sanders". Trump? Then "Hillary is in the banks pockets just like the rest."

Well, true .. and why *aren't* the bankers in big trouble rather than 
continuing to be too big to fail and building even more risky financial stunts? 
As far as I know, only one banker is in jail and it is in Europe, not the US.

And these weren't idiots, just folks angry at just how bad things are .. just 
like the Rancher's Rights at Malheur.

Amok may be just what voters are about to be. It isn't populism, exactly .. its just 
plain mad and may have surprising "uprisings" as a result.

--
⇔ glen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to