Glen -

I appreciate the nuance here.

I have been dealing with crypto-fascists all of my life... we have discussed the libertarian vs the Libertarian, I have endured the years where Lefty political correctness was approaching fascism and I have had to endure the Righty style fascism that seems to be hitting a crescendo under the rallying cry of that "man-child" running for president.

I isolate myself enough in daily life so as NOT to have to spend too many cycles on this constant interpretation, for those who do not have that luxury, I understand that this can be deeply painful to the psyche if not the soul.

I refer you to the musical observations of the philosophers known as "They Might be Giants":

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow-nuHCTA5E

Unfortunately, *I* believe that the language we use in our communication deeply informs the language we use to think... and that by adjusting our discourse with others can lead us to think (for better or worse) differently. I believe that the damage being done to our culture today is as much the way our thinking is modified by this presidential race as it is the possible outcomes. We are leading ourselves to believe that our only two choices are to become a xenophobic, retrograde, bigoted people or to continue with a status quo which is clearly not serving many, many people very well.

While I don't completely agree with or support Jill and the Greens, I DO appreciate the alternative rhetoric they have offered. Her *very* low polling indicates to me that either *many* of us really aren't willing to think outside of one of the two boxes offered to us, OR, there is something specifically wrong with their message that *I* am not getting?

What I hear pretty exclusively is "I won't vote for them because nobody else is voting for them" or maybe even more pointedly "I won't listen to them because nobody else is listening to them".

- Steve



On 11/8/16 8:25 AM, ┣glen┫ wrote:
Right.  It's not quite right to suggest that switching codes is bimodal or 
bivalent.  I think it's more of a spectrum, at least in an informal sense.  If 
we were talking about a person trying to communicate a complex idea in a 
non-native language then switching to their native language, that would be more 
bimodal.  But I'm talking more about, eg, realizing in the middle of a 
conversation that you're talking to a crypto-fascist who puts up a good veneer 
at first, then reveals their fascism over the course of the conversation.  When 
I realize it, I switch, either to something that will completely alienate the 
person, or to language that makes me sound more like a fascist, depending on 
how I feel at the time.

Marcus' idea of a an interpreter vs. languages closer to the bare metal is, I 
think, akin to Nick's idea of imaginary vs. factual.  And the gist is solid.  
There's a very high overhead interpreting through many layers of abstraction or 
entertaining imaginary worlds through the suspension of disbelief.  It's a 
luxury we can't always afford.  But both assume there exists a bare metal.  I'm 
a constructivist, for the most part, and believe all our languages are 
interpreted and there really is no such thing as a natural, close to the metal, 
machine code.  There are no linguistic or cognitive facts, only action facts.  
And this may be closer to what you're trying to say, because that means that we 
are always interacting through an interpreter, albeit sometimes many layers out 
vs. only a few layers out.



On 11/07/2016 08:05 PM, Steven A Smith wrote:
I guess I already feel I have to "code switch" all the time already...  I have 
to speak a pidgin of Left/Right/Green/Libertarian/Anarchist just to communicate with my 
friends and colleagues on these matters.  I understand and agree that in world D, the 
emergent patois will be much less familiar/comfortable than the one I have now and that 
in world H, it will be much more familiar, less abrupt of a change.  I guess I assumed 
that Agent G and agent M were more like me in this regard than maybe they are.

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to