On 06/12/2017 02:03 PM, Nick Thompson wrote: > What you are calling "levels" I am calling "cross sections"?
Yes, a cross section would be 1 level. > And it is the partial arbitrariness of what one sees in a cross section that > makes it less valuable than a layer. Not quite. What you see inside a cross section isn't as important as the fact that a cross section is _different_ from a hemispherical peeling. But the important thing ... the MOST important thing is that a level is just a specific type of layer, whereas there are plenty of layers that are not levels. I.e. layer is more generically applicable than level. -- ☣ glen ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
