"I conceptually like the ideas behind it, but it takes immutability to more of an extreme than I feel is necessary (e.g. unless you use its software transactional memory constructs, there is no way to re-bind a local variable)."
In Haskell, if this is needed, one uses the State Monad. https://wiki.haskell.org/State_Monad ________________________________ From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Gary Schiltz <g...@naturesvisualarts.com> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 2:04:44 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Classes, Complexity, and Functional Programming – Kent C. Dodds – Medium Interesting timing. Although I don't do much software development these days, I've been fiddling around with Clojure off and on for the last few years. I conceptually like the ideas behind it, but it takes immutability to more of an extreme than I feel is necessary (e.g. unless you use its software transactional memory constructs, there is no way to re-bind a local variable). Also, the programming environment with the most advanced support for it is emacs, and I haven't drank enough koolaid to grok it fully. So, just last night I decided to download Racket (a scheme dialect with a nice simple IDE). So far, I have been having a blast with it. Part of the reason I downloaded it is that I wanted to run programs from the book "The Little Schemer", which among other things is a crash course on replacing iterating and mutating of data structures with purely functional recursive solutions. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Owen Densmore <o...@backspaces.net<mailto:o...@backspaces.net>> wrote: I know, I know, functional programming is as fun as hitting your head with a brick. But this article does a nice job of showing how functional programming is very Self-like: https://me dium.com/@kentcdodds/classes-complexity-and-functional-programming-a8dd86903747<http://dium.com/@kentcdodds/classes-complexity-and-functional-programming-a8dd86903747> It's objects and functions all the way down, and for me the best is no `this`. It is a bit scary letting go of "central control" Classes provide, very human. I mean, who's *boss*? Do any of us *use* functional programming? -- Owen ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
