Mmm Neil DeGrasse Tysson, and Guy Consolmagno talked about quantum mechanics some on Nova (love watching that on youtube) (LOL I still don't get it and asked help understanding it many people): Basically the new guess is some how particles are actually just energy. That energy goes reely reely fast so fast in fact it seems (to people like me) that say a beer cup at second street is solid. so can hold beer, great hardy food etc. So what if (Elon Musk and Brian Green) Ask: their's smaller and smaller particles? are they connected somehow? and is it small and smaller untill you get to the qunatum (reel reely reeely small level) Like possibly smaller even than a quark small. I happily differ to others as to if Fermi lab has been able to figure out how likely that might be.
Relativity is indeed very awsome ^_^ Einstein is awsome. I also LOVE reading Hawkings stuff. He's recently asking a simillar question to me: "Wait so were all made of star stuff and energy? How does that work" I don't know. I love that I don't. Isn't Quantum Energy guessing that at reely reely small levels what happens between kinds of particles? And did they figure out why this happens yet? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/06/china-s-quantum-satellite-achieves-spooky-action-record-distance On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> wrote: > Stephen will like this: > > Some researchers suspect that ultimately the axioms of a quantum > reconstruction will be about information: what can and can’t be done with > it. One such derivation of quantum theory based on axioms about information > was proposed in 2010 by Chiribella, then working at the Perimeter > Institute, and his collaborators Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano and Paolo Perinotti > of the University of Pavia in Italy. “Loosely speaking,” explained Jacques > Pienaar, a theoretical physicist at the University of Vienna, “their > principles state that information should be localized in space and time, > that systems should be able to encode information about each other, and > that every process should in principle be reversible, so that information > is conserved.” (In irreversible processes, by contrast, information is > typically lost — just as it is when you erase a file on your hard drive.) > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This is kinda interesting: >> >> https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-theory-rebuilt-from- >> simple-physical-principles-20170830/ >> >> Basically look at it like this: >> - Relativity: Is founded on a few simple physical principles like the >> limit on the speed of light. >> - Quantum Theory: Is founded on equations that match observation. >> >> Both make sense. But QT hasn't that satisfying basis that relativity has. >> >> Apparently a bunch of folks are trying to fix that. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
