No, I don't agree.  I had intended to reply to Dave's (twice repeated) question 
about the speed of evolution with this response.  But I'll do it, here, anyway. 
 Remember that I'm not a biologist.  So, corrections of what I say are more 
than welcome.  It seems to me that natural selection is multi-grained.  Even if 
we reject the general concept of group selection, I think it's safe to say that 
something like our "dopaminergic system" can be selected for or against just as 
well as some behavior like fight or flight.  At the very least, we can talk 
about the speed of evolution in bacteria and the idea that we are covered in, 
and filled with bacteria (which affects our survivability in the face of what 
we eat and breathe).  But you're right that I would NOT argue that the map from 
mechanism to phenomenon is simple.  Selection is phenomenal.  However, the 
structure of the systems being operated on are not merely 2-layer gen-phen 
systems.  They're a complex convolution of 2-layer systems, some fast, some 
slow, some tiny, some large, etc., all inter-embedded with each other.  The 
phenomenal "function" of one 2-layer part might well be considered the 
generative mechanism of another 2-layer part.

So, no, natural selection doesn't simply select function.  Even if 
*technically* true, that's an over-simplification.


On 02/21/2018 11:59 AM, Steven A Smith wrote:
> But don't you agree that *physiology* is NOT what is being directly
> selected for, but rather what is more directly *expressed* from what is
> *encoded* (genome) (therefore easier to identify/detect/measure).  Is it
> not *function* rather than *form* which is being selected?   Isn't that
> the point of *exaptation*, that one phenotypic element originally
> selected for around *one* context/utility function trips into another
> context with an entirely different utility?

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to