Gary, 

 

Yes.  Of course.  That’s right.  But then, what exactly ARE we headed for.  
Designed, as we were, as a species on the brink of extinction, how do we handle 
success?  

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary Schiltz
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 4:31 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Income Equality

 

Hey Nick, what species of hominid do you think would go for that? I'm thinking 
maybe bonobos, but Homo sapiens' certainly doesn't seem to be headed that way. 
It would be nice in a utopian sort of way, but doesn't seem too likely.

 

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 5:03 PM Nick Thompson <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

All,

Look.  Let's assume that competing is what we humans do.  So, we have to afford 
ways for them to compete.  But, if we are humanists, it is obvious that those 
domains of competition should not include essentials to human life.  Those 
should be equal.  Relentlessly equal, to the point that nobody can compute on 
them no matter how hard they try.  We need excess income police patrolling the 
streets, day and night.  So, I got my basic income, my basic healthcare, how I 
do compete?  By doing better with that basic resource than you do.  We both 
have a basic housing allowance.  My house has a cupula on it.  So THERE!   
Since we cannot increase our consumption by earning more income, the only way 
to show off is by conserving resources in all domains other than the Domain of 
Display.  Huge benefit for the environment.  Uh-oh!  What if the Domain of 
Display becomes Passenger Pigeon feathers.  Hmmm! Back to the old drawing 
board. 

N

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/


-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of u?l? ?
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 12:01 PM
To: FriAM <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Income Equality

Steve points to a pragmatic way to find the answer to a permutation of the 
question. But it's interesting to me to try to answer the question as written: 
Why ... should NOT ...?  If I reformulate it, we may lose the original intent, 
but arrive at a clearer question:

Why _should_ everyone's annual income be different?  ... or at least 
independent?

I think the answer boils down to identity, selfhood, and membership.  As long 
as we define ourselves in terms of money, jobs, careers, hobbies, family, ... 
what type of bicycle we ride, etc., then our incomes should, as a moral 
imperative, be commensurately unique as those other attributes.  As such 
categories fuzzify and disappear, then we'll be closer to homogenous incomes.  
Artificially homogenized incomes, in the presence of fully diverse things like 
assets or hobbies, will only lead to dissonance.

Putting the question back in context, is homogenized annual income "one 
reaction step away" from our current state?  No way.

On 4/1/19 8:17 AM, Steven A Smith wrote:
> 
> On 3/31/19 11:20 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
>>
>> "Why exactly is it that everybody shouldn't have the same annual income?"
>>
> Try it and you will get a very quick and probably series of blunt answers.
> 
> I've had my version of that fantasy and the next step in it is to find 
> the person in the room with the lowest income (the shabby homeless person 
> lurking in the back is a good start) (or just arbitrarily pick some one 
> standing next to you) and offer to "average incomes" with them.    Repeat.   
> Not everyone will participate, maybe only those with "similar" incomes will 
> share, but the exercise would be useful, even with Monopoly Money.
> 
> Ultimately this can become a "sorting exercise".   It would be much easier to 
> "share" what you have with someone just a little less well off than you.    
> As a bottom up exercise, (least wealthy shares with next least, repeat) it 
> might work well until you hit the big disparity gaps... The billionaires 
> won't want to share with the millionaires nor they with the 
> upper-middle-class but there might be a trickle-up effect that relieved a LOT 
> in the meantime.   Just sayin'.
> 
> I am in the midst (literally today) of a complex of "pay it forward" 
> exercises with friends, organizations and acquaintances who either are, or 
> support folks living in or near homelessness.   A little bit of $$, Time, 
> Attention goes a *LONG* way with these folks.   I'm not averaging my income 
> with them, but in the spirit of religious tithing, I probably do give order 
> 10% of my income and time to these kinds of exercises and *I* believe that 
> provides a several X leverage factor for what I do give.   It can be tedious, 
> it can feel risky, it can be disappointing sometimes, but it feels a lot more 
> connected than writing a check to one of the big charities.  I AM a fan of 
> some of those (many not), so don't want to dissuade that kind of giving, just 
> encourage more personal, local, engaged "sharing".


--
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ 
<http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC> 
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ 
<http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC> 
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to