Glen writes:
"So, what pragmatic reason is there to make the distinction you make here?"
HR often departments act as if the feature space for skills can be represented
as a binary vector associated with a given candidate. That resource is a thing
they try to acquire and will get rid of when they no longer need it. A rich
enough company might even hold on to such resources just so that another
company couldn't get it. They aren't as bald-faced as calling their
employees property though. They don't hesitate to use terms like
"intellectual property", however.
On 11/6/19 4:08 PM, Steven A Smith wrote:
> Glen loosely defines capitalism as *private ownership of property* but i
want to further refine it to be private ownership of *the means of production*,
...
--
☣ uǝlƃ
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
