Nick writes:

< Can somebody explain “overclocking” >

A computer's processor (CPU) runs at a certain clock rate.  These days it is 
around 3 billion cycles per second on average.   A higher clock rate will 
generate more heat and increase the risk of a malfunction (or a meltdown).  To 
mitigate this, manufacturers or enthusiasts will add cooling systems.  That 
could be anything from a large heatsink to liquid nitrogen.   My main computer 
has a closed-loop water-based system.  The pump breaks down about once a year, 
and then I have to buy a new one.   The cooling system is more useful to 
mitigate temperature variations in the ambient environment than it is to 
increase the clock rate.  The degree to which a processor can be overclocked 
varies by processor design.   Typically it isn't very much, but with a good 
cooling system a 30% increase in performance can be possible.

To really get high clock rates, there is the possibility of using 
superconductors.  This engineering work is in its infancy.

Marcus
________________________________
From: Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of Nick Thompson 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:06 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] post you seem to have missed from FRIAM


Can somebody explain “overclocking”



That’s a new one for me.



Nick



Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/



From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 5:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] post you seem to have missed from FRIAM



Marcus,



"puritanism" was mentioned only because Nick, and indirectly Frank, used the 
term as a self-descriptor. Obviously there are other reasons for self imposed 
limits other than puritanism.



You might not pour gasoline on your computer to improve it, but you might 
overclock it.  For me, hallucinogens are closer to overclocking the brain/mind 
while cocaine, morphine, oxycodone, etc. are akin to gasoline. The latter are 
(bad) habit inducing but not the former.



Interestingly, most hallucinogens also have a side effect  like overclocking — 
of generating excess heat.



davew









On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, at 7:07 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

Dave writes:



< Puritanism is one of those things that IS relative, in the sense that most 
everyone has a line that is not to be crossed, for no objective, rational, 
reason but just because "I don't want to." I won't use recreational drugs (e.g. 
cocaine), drink to excess, or read (well I have, but don't anymore) romance 
novels. We are all puritans sometimes. >



Puritanism?  Among the reasons I don’t take cocaine is that I held/hold a 
security clearance and I would have been caught within a few months if I had 
done that.   For example, I also would not think of improving my computer by 
pouring gasoline on it.   Why would I expect some ham-handed intervention like 
that to work on my brain?   Why should I go out of my way to find more bad 
habits within unknown consequences?



Marcus

============================================================

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College

to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to