Well, it's not really the curation of triggers that you raise. You're raising the curation of possible actions/bins the trigger disambiguates. My claim is that will (largely) take care of itself if people think hard about the triggers.
As silly as it may seem for, say, some middle class white woman to call 911 when she sees a crowd of black teens using the swimming pool, if we could somehow encourage her to *consciously* consider that trigger, the crowd of black teens at the pool, I claim that such consideration *automatically* curates the triggered action. The more she thinks about her triggers, the less likely she is to assign an unreasonable action to that trigger. And it's not clear to me that you really need curation of the triggers. The trigger can remain for the rest of one's life. For example, I suspect I have trypophobia <https://www.google.com/search?q=trypophobia&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi6wPbzsOPnAhXVsJ4KHfiIDusQ_AUoAXoECBEQAw&biw=1489&bih=861>. But having a *name* for the trigger helps me a lot, even if I can't help that my heart races and I start sweating when I look at that set of google images. On 2/21/20 11:10 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > No problem with that, provided it is a actively and skeptically curated set > of triggers. If one has to call the police every time a trigger fires, then > that's a crude trigger that should be replaced with a better one. -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
