Marcus -


I believe that Andrew Niccol DID imagine something like that:


I wish I had a pithy preamble for this dystopian BioPunk reference, but
perhaps it speaks for itself?


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gattaca


- Steve

> Steve writes:
>
> < The whole world is responding to what is *roughly* the same virus
> with *roughly* what is the same human phenotype/metabolism in a myriad
> of *roughly* the same modes of human organization. >
>
> There are hundreds of common HLA alleles across humans.   In a diverse
> country like the US, with hundreds of thousands of positive cases and
> tens of thousands of deaths the hundreds of alleles would be well
> sampled.   Too bad our medical surveillance is so bad, and made worse
> by the moron.  Imagine if everyone had full genome sequencing and
> every viral sample was deep sequenced. 
>
> Marcus
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Steven A Smith
> <sasm...@swcp.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 19, 2020 10:11 AM
> *To:* friam@redfish.com <friam@redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Judea Pearl: Book of Why
>  
>
>> One way to address the N/A issue is to repeatedly perturb the real-world 
>> system so as to elicit those correlations.  When that is practical.. 
>
> We are, in a time of real-world system perturbation, right now.  The
> whole world is responding to what is *roughly* the same virus with
> *roughly* what is the same human phenotype/metabolism in a myriad of
> *roughly* the same modes of human organization.   This IS a testbed of
> human (-system?) response to a widespread, somewhat invisible
> threat.   From Wuhan to Singapore to Italy to Iran to Sweden to
> Germany to NYC to WA State to the Navajo Nation to Florida's beaches,
> this IS a huge coupled systems dynamics/agent-model executed in
> real-time by real-people with real casualties and real consequences.  
>
> We are, to varying degrees (collectively) recording the results of
> these "experiments" and if we are lucky (or smart, or both) we will do
> some post-game analysis intended to understand more-better how best to
> (self-)organize around a (nearly) existential world-scale threat.  
> And to the extent this is a game that will never end, we have to begin
> the analysis while we cope with it's consequences.   Feels a bit like
> the models pof Physics Interreality.
>
>     https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.057201
> <https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.057201>
>
> Hanging too aggressive of a model on this (or collecting the data 
> against too premature of a model) will reduce the utility of such data
> gathering and analysis.   Whatever the dual of overfitting a model
> is?  Overmodeling?  Premature Modeling?
>
> What I'm looking (askance) to(ward) Pearl for is a better way of
> rapidly constructing, maintaining, revising as generic of a model as
> possible in response to "this moment".   Four months ago we should
> have been interested in models of how one limits a virus such as
> COVID19 getting a foothold in this country.   One month ago we should
> have been interested in how one limits COVID19 (with new understanding
> of it's virility, it's fatality, it's symptoms, it's mode of spread)
> once it HAS a foothold,  now we are faced with trying to understand
> how to cope with it once it is pervasive in our population whilst
> continuing/returning to "business as usual" and in another thread, I'm
> encouraging that we "try to plan/consider/think-about" what we want to
> do with this somewhat "blank slate" (our ass?) we are having  handed
> to us.  
>
> And how to think about this without premature modeling... what I think
> I was railing (whining/pushing-back) about with Dave on the Bellamyist
> thread earlier this morning.
>
> - Steve
>
>>> On Apr 19, 2020, at 8:33 AM, uǝlƃ ☣ <geprope...@gmail.com> 
>>> <mailto:geprope...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, the argument I often end up making is that you can do a kind of face 
>>> validation with the fake data. Show it to someone who's used to dealing 
>>> with that sort of data and if the fake data looks a lot like the data they 
>>> normally deal with, then maybe more data-taking isn't necessary. If it 
>>> looks fake to the "expert", then more data-taking is definitely needed.
>>>
>>>> On 4/19/20 8:29 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>>>> I have a hard time with this as a way to extend data.   If it is 
>>>> high-dimensional it will be under-sampled.  Seems better to me to  measure 
>>>> or simulate more so that the joint distribution can be realistic.  And if 
>>>> you can do that there is no reason to infer the joint distribution because 
>>>> you *have* it. 
>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Frank Wimberly <wimber...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> <mailto:wimber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Going back and forth:  If you infer the causal graph from observational 
>>>>> data you can use that graph to simulate data with the same joint 
>>>>> distribution as the original data.
>>> -- 
>>> ☣ uǝlƃ
>>>
>>> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... 
>>> .... . ...
>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>> unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
>> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... 
>> .... . ...
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
>>
>
> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... 
> .... . ...
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to