"I think it would be wise to watch the evolution of the virus over time within 
people and across people"Scientists do this already, and they found out for 
instance that most NY cases came from Europe, not from China directly. Carl 
Zimmer reported about it in the NY Times. This is the article Donald 
misunderstood...https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/08/science/new-york-coronavirus-cases-europe-genomes.html..so
 that Carl had to correct 
himhttps://twitter.com/carlzimmer/status/1249132628755787782-J.
-------- Original message --------From: Marcus Daniels <[email protected]> 
Date: 4/19/20  21:50  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity 
Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Judea Pearl: Book of Why 

Roger directs us to the story about Biohub:
 
< It was also different, in an important way. The commercial labs are set up to 
take in the samples and spit out a simple answer: positive or negative. They 
aren’t set up, as the Biohub is, to sequence the genome of every positive 
specimen
 and look for variations among them. As it moves through the population, the 
virus replicates and, as DeRisi says, “every time you replicate something there 
is a chance of an error.” He’s already found tiny differences from one 
coronavirus genome to the next
 — not so great that it changes the essential nature of the virus but 
noticeable nevertheless.  >
 
I think it would be wise to watch the evolution of the virus over time within 
people and across people.   I’ve heard experts argue it is slowly mutating, but 
I’ve personally seen deep sequence data (just from Genbank) reveal other 
variants. 
  The stakes are high enough that shortcuts seem like a bad idea to me.  And 
the technology exists to do the deep sequencing.   That’s good point IMO about 
how Quest and LabCorp are designed to do positive/negative tests.  Imagine the 
disaster that happens
 if the tests become fragile, like the CDC tests were..
 
Marcus
 
 

From: Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of Roger Critchlow 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 12:30 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Judea Pearl: Book of Why


 


UCSF has something like this, 
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-04-17/chan-zuckerberg-biohub-is-ready-for-coronavirus-tests-to-come


 


-- rec --


 


 


On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 1:40 PM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]> wrote:





Dave writes:


 




< Marcus said, "Imagine if everyone had full genome sequencing and every viral 
sample was deep sequenced." Iceland has something close to this already. >


 


https://www.decode.com/publications/


 


Marcus



.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/




.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to