Yes, while the clip was a nice explanation about Bayesian updating, the 
narrator’s statement that we need to make assumptions about prevalence seem to 
me like they send the viewer on a wrong turn.

It’s just an affine transform.  If you know the sensitivity and the selectivity 
of your test (which presumably you get from the design process before you 
deploy it), then the fraction of test-positives and test-negatives is just a 
linear function of the fraction of true-positives and true-negatives, +/- 
sampling noise.  In a large sample, the noise can be pushed down as a fraction 
of the mean.

So the test-positives and test-negatives do not equal the true-positives and 
true-negatives, but the former are an invertible function of the latter.  This 
is a simplification of a binary variable, I think.  But I haven’t taken a 
minute to go looking for a range of examples to show where non-invertibility 
starts.  I imagine again all this was largely worked out between 1500 and 1700, 
and is in basic stats textbooks.

I think everything I have said above is right.  I did take a minute to just 
write out the decomposition in terms of priors, likelihoods, and posteriors on 
a sheet of paper, and the linear function sits there and looks at me, so I 
don’t think I am spouting off the cuff.

Anyway,

Eric



> On May 1, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Tom Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Good explanation.  But it always comes back to the basic question: What are 
> the methods and data informing our assumptions about prevalence, at this 
> moment, in a population?  Or am I wrong?
> Tom
>  
> 
> ============================================
> Tom Johnson - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Institute for Analytic Journalism   --     Santa Fe, NM USA
> 505.577.6482(c)                                    505.473.9646(h)
> NM Foundation for Open Government <http://nmfog.org/>
> Check out It's The People's Data 
> <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Its-The-Peoples-Data/1599854626919671>        
>          
> ============================================
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 4:03 PM George Duncan <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Here's an easy numerical example of why conditional probabilities as employed 
> in Bayes Rule are important:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5FfTjJtV3E&feature=share 
> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dx5FfTjJtV3E%26feature%3Dshare&data=02%7C01%7Ckelsey%40edc.pitt.edu%7Cd4539c648e544adc9a3608d7ec422ca0%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C1%7C637237641268432573&sdata=sSVCqTqIkvlnbjX%2BoUoUxdPdt%2FolTIHHw%2FZiJzCgCMk%3D&reserved=0>
>  
>  
> George Duncan
> Emeritus Professor of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University
> georgeduncanart.com <http://georgeduncanart.com/>
> See posts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
> Land: (505) 983-6895  
> Mobile: (505) 469-4671
>  
> My art theme: Dynamic exposition of the tension between matrix order and 
> luminous chaos.
> 
> "Attempt what is not certain. Certainty may or may not come later. It may 
> then be a valuable delusion."
> From "Notes to myself on beginning a painting" by Richard Diebenkorn. 
> "It's that knife-edge of uncertainty where we come alive to our truest 
> power." Joanna Macy.
> 
> 
> 
> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... 
> .... . ...
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
> <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
> unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com 
> <http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ 
> <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/>
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
> <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> 
> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... 
> .... . ...
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to