Eric, Cool, I misunderstood is all. I very much appreciate what you accumulate for a week and drop. I would be sorry to not have it, so please do what you need. Thank you for drawing my attention to *polysemy* and its operational relation to *overloading*, which in turn I am connecting to *polymorphism* (computing not biology). What I am hearing is *polysemy* is not a *metaphor* and that both have a role to play in our denotational language games. Further, these games are only interesting if they assist in exploring new domains. In the meantime, you advocate for not making the collaborative explorations harder on ourselves than we need. Hell, there is a lot of work to be done so let's not rewrite Russell's Principia.
Jon
-- --- .-. . .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... -..-. .- .-. . -..-. - .... . -..-. . ... ... . -. - .. .- .-.. -..-. .-- --- .-. -.- . .-. ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
