I think Glen is saying "Don't take the simple story on face value," not necessarily "Read a canonical prescription," and that Eric is saying "The story is inherently ambiguous." I am probably wrong both times. :-)
On 6/18/20, 7:33 AM, "Friam on behalf of ∄ uǝlƃ" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Ha! I have no idea what that means. Google tells me its some ancient Chinese secret <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzixL7Ef-bI>. On 6/17/20 9:42 PM, David Eric Smith wrote: > >> read the code. Read the code! READ THE DAMNED CODE! > > gate gate paragate parasamgate bodhi svaha -- ☣ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
