Ha! "Present company excluded" obviously. 8^D I used to be careful to apply that caveat when I went around willy-nilly insulting whole swaths of people. Marcus is right; I am getting old and going down denying it all the way.
Do you think you were *lucky* to get such constructive feedback? Or did you, perhaps, recommend people to review it, knowing they would be knowledgeable and interested? On 6/29/20 3:40 PM, David Eric Smith wrote: > Hey! > >> On Jun 30, 2020, at 7:38 AM, ∄ uǝlƃ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ha! Nah. Books are for people who can't handle peer review > > We got peer reviewed, by five people. One of the reviews was 35 pages long. > The editor said he had never received anything like it. Parts of it were so > useful we used them to rewrite the preface. > > >> ... or ... what's the aphorism? I would have written a shorter letter if I'd >> had the time? ... something like that. Books are for people who can't think >> clear enough to keep the verbiage down. >> -- ☣ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
