Russ, your replies are always thought-provoking. I think it is fascinating that 
the "hard problem of consciousness", the problem of predictability and the 
"problem of free will" are related. Hard problem of consciousness: we think we 
can not know what it is like to be someone else. But Hollywood has found ways 
to solve it. It uses time travel. Movies allow us to travel to different times 
and places. They allow us to acquire intimate knowledge of the other person. 
Movies are based on stories, which are contained in books. They can show us 
what it is like to be someone else by providing us intimate historic 
knowledge.Problem of predictability: because of the hard problem we can not 
know in principle how someone will act or why someone would commit a crime. But 
whodunit movies always give a convincing explanation. Investigators interview 
the participants to find out what happened. This allow us to acquire intimate 
knowledge of the delinquent. In hindsight it is possible to say why someone 
acted in a certain way if we have intimate historic knowledge.In both cases 
understanding of adaptive systems boils down to intimate historic knowledge. 
Guiding future developments is also possible if we can influence the future, 
which allows us to solve the...Problem of free will: we think we can control 
ourself because we have we free will. But modern neurocience says we can not. 
Our decisions are determined by the wiring in our heads (=our personality), by 
our emotions (=the hormones in our body) and by the environment. Yet humans 
have found a way to control themselves. Self-consciousness allows us to block 
certain actions by imagining the consequences. And we can control our future 
self by using the environment. We can pray (=speak to our future self), or we 
sign up for a course (=force our future self to learn), or write an entry in 
our diary or calendar (=remind our future self). All these activities influence 
the future self to act in a certain way.In all cases language in written or 
spoken form allows us to break the limitations of the current moment, to escape 
the tyranny of the present. In the words of Carl Sagan: free will can emerge 
because language breaks the shackles of time. And I thought in school that 
language is boring.-J. 
-------- Original message --------From: Russell Standish 
<[email protected]> Date: 7/5/20  08:18  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning 
Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] God On 
Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 04:06:01PM +0200, Jochen Fromm wrote:> I am not sure I 
agree with the arguments from you Russ. You say "People aren't> the same, but 
they are similar - and human society functions because we can> predict to some 
extent what other people are likely to do [...]. We have also> evolved the 
ability to 'put ourselves in somebody else's skin', taking into> account the 
obvious external differences."> > But we cannot predict what someone else will 
do, only if we know the person> really well - for instance if it is your wife 
or husband for 30 years. In> whodunit films it becomes clear in the end why 
people have acted they way they> did, but only in hindsight. In hindsight we 
almost always can say why people> acted the way they did, but we cannot predict 
it beforehand. You say hindsight> is 20/20 for this in English, right?Leave a 
$100 bill on a park bench. What do you predict the next personto sit at that 
seat will do?Yes - someone you know well will be more predictable - my wife 
says so!I might also predict that if I disturb a magpie's nest, the bird 
willattack me.Also humans have the ability to reason what others predict they 
mightdo (3rd order reasoning), and deliberately do a contrary thing if 
thatgames the interaction. Not many other species have that ability (someother 
great apes have been shown to reason that way, IIRC, but that'sabout it). But 
humans are also capable of seeing through that sort ofdeceit too, via 4th order 
reasoning, but that recursive capabilitymaxes out at 5th order IIUC.I would say 
most humans are actually quite predictable most of thetime. But some are 
distinctly less so, and quite possibly successfulas a result. Donald Trump is 
probably like this. He comes up with alot of crazy stuff, so it's really hard 
to figure out what he'sthinking.> > We also haven't evolved the ability to "put 
ourselves in somebody else's skin".> It is not impossible, but can be very 
difficult and requires detailed knowledge> and imagination. This is the reason 
why Hollywood has invented cinemas to show> us how what it is like to be 
somebody else (the GoPro cameras in modern days> have the same 
function).>Contrariwise, in a game where an object is hidden in one spot, 
thenwhen a person leaves the room, and the object is moved to anotherspot. Upon 
returning to the room, where do you think that person willstart looking for the 
object. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally–Anne_testApparently, children 
under the age of 4 have difficulty with thistask, but older humans successfully 
see the situation from someoneelse's point of view. So yes, the task is 
difficult, and undoubtedlyrequires detailed knowledge, but adult humans are 
able to do this with ease.> Therefore I tend to disagree with both statements. 
> > -J.>Maybe we don't disagree, but just misunderstand each other :).-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------Dr 
Russell Standish                    Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)Principal, High 
Performance Coders     [email protected]                      
http://www.hpcoders.com.au-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .FRIAM Applied Complexity 
Group listservZoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comarchives: 
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to