On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Marcus Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’d say if there is some kind of communication that can occur (verbal or > non-verbal) that entity has higher status than those than cannot engage in > communication. > There ia a fun example of this from ethnography, which I used to open a talk at the ABQ museum of natural history many years ago, to introduce the diorama that the NM Highlands Media Arts kids had created for Origin of Life.
I will get all the diacritics wrong below, but indulge me. The motif was self/other distinctions, and how they have come from human habit also to put unwarranted priors of separation into science. This is from the Ju/`hoansi of S. Africa and Namibia. Their name for themselves is also the generic term for humans. They have another word, /!xon, for wild and dangerous things. Interesting thing is, what makes something a kind of /!xon is that you can’t understand its language. Thus there are both 4-legged and 2-legged /!xon, with the Bantu herders and farmers who flooded into the region 800 years ago, as well as the Afrikaners, being the 2-legged kind. In that set, the Ju/`hoansi rank the 4-legged /!xon a little higher than the 2-legged kind, saying of the 4-leggers “we can at least understand their language a little”. I believe that and other such stories come from here: https://www.amazon.com/Dobe-Hoansi-STUDIES-CULTURAL-ANTHROPOLOGY/dp/1111828776 I have a particular empathy with that story. Eric
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
