Right, Marcus.  That's where I ended up, too.  While I need to IMAGINE that you 
can understand me, in order to write some of what I write, the fact that you 
don't, in the short run, doesn't matter.  The illusion of you attentively 
listening has broken many a writer's block.  I would hate it if some Good 
Government A-hole like me would start dictating what could our not appear on 
FRIAM.  

 

You are in the unenviable position of agreeing with me. (};-\)

 

However, I do wonder what some of those people would say if we were better at 
engaging them. 

 

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

[email protected]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 4:03 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Acronyms

 

I'm not sure who you are accusing of what, and it doesn't matter.   Fwiw, I 
suppose I follow  a few underlying principles by default, unless I am being 
paid or whatnot:

 

1) If someone is motivated to make a point or understand some topic, as there 
was some indication in some cases, then if some muttering is alien to them, 
they'll bother to puzzle it out or ask without being petulant about it.

 

2) The burden is not on the speaker/sharer unless the speaker especially cares 
that the topic be understood and perhaps acted upon.  Say, if the speaker is 
engaging in political advocacy, or defending some claim where they have some 
skin in the game.   

 

3) Electrons are cheap to move around and attention can be modulated.

 

Marcus

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Friam < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> On 
Behalf Of  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 11:03 AM

To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' < 
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Acronyms

 

Well, generally that is the paradox.  But the narcissism I am talking about is 
INTRA group narcissism  -- writing a post that one knows damn well only 2 
members of the group will understand.   We are a sufficiently broad group that 
I imagine that if we developed a language understood by most of us, it would 
also be understood by a lot of other people.  

 

But there is value to narcissism that might be lost if we tried to standardize. 
 That you all understand me is an illusion that helps me to write, and when I 
write, thoughts happen that I did not plan on happening.  Even if NONE of you 
understood, that would be a gain for me.  I think many of us write to the list 
in this delusional way, and I can't claim that that's altogether a Bad Thing. 

 

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Friam < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> On 
Behalf Of u?l? ???

Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 12:46 PM

To:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Acronyms

 

IDK, man. This contribution rings a bit hollow. Jargon, insider jokes and 
words, etc. all serve group cohesion. Coming from Nick, who sporadically talks 
of FriAM as important *as a group*, including attempts to formulate some 
threads as coherent presentable things, it seems good, generalized/popularized, 
communication is antithetic.

 

But it *does* bode well for treating forum posts as public essays rather than 
intra-group chatting ... which I've argued is the case. A flaw in my argument, 
that those who disagree with me have yet to point out, is that despite being 
publicly available on Nabble, it's not really a public forum. It's not widely 
read. We *do* use obComplexity jargon just to titillate each other. Etc. 
Perhaps the biggest obstacle to viewing these posts as public essays is that we 
don't have a standard set of rules (like Frank's) posts are expected to follow.

 

So, the classical mathetists among us will argue that you can't have your cake 
and eat it. Either we're a group of insiders, a tribe, or this is a publication 
medium which should have some associated rules. Perhaps that's the paradox 
Nick's after?

 

On 1/26/21 10:19 AM,  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] 
wrote:

> This correspondence has been an example of it self.  Narcissism is the 

> enemy of communication.

> 

> I suppose there is SOME sense in putting obscurities in email blasts to the 
> list and clasping to your bosom anybody who happens to understand you. (I did 
> that with my recent supervenience post and got one answer that was 
> tremendously helpful)  It’s like hitchhiking, then;  you only need one ride.  
> But while it makes some sense, as a general strategy of communication,  isn’t 
> it a bit pathetic, after all? Isn’t there some paradox in communication that 
> is designed to be exclusive?

 

 

--

↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe  
<http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com> 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC  <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:  <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/> 
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

 

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe  
<http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com> 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC  <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:  <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/> 
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe  
<http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com> 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC  <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:  <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/> 
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to