Ha! Well-done. To be clear, I only argued that *were* I a Senator, which is laughable due to my lack of self-control, I would probably vote to acquit because they charged him with the wrong high crime. I'm definitely one of the ones who would be moderated out sooner rather than later ... though Renee' is usually moderated out even before me ... which is an expression of True Love. 8^D
On 1/27/21 2:17 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > One can navigate some moderation by structuring arguments in pieces, leaving > it to the reader to fill in some dots. In crude form, we saw that with > Trump and the riots. (I recall you argued he wouldn't be convicted in a > court of law.) > One can call this self-censorship, but it is also self-control. The kind of > self-control that rioters lacked is a good thing to incentivize; it is useful > to let those without self-control get nabbed; they are plainly dangerous. > > “People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought > which they seldom use.” ― Søren Kierkegaard -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
