Glen, I love this analogy. As a kid, we had a version of "hack ball" in almost anything we did. To some extent, it was exactly the loosely defined and chaotic character of the play that shouldered the work of seduction. Children intuitively know that *hack ball* between others can be *play* for them too, the medium is the invitation, the affordance of which is almost gifted to them by their own inability to be neurotically formal. Your comment takes me back to elementary school playground games, games where at times the entire playground was engaged and whose rules could only be locally defined. Is it that you are suggesting a trade-off?
-- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
