Hey, Steve, sorry if I appeared to shrug your question off.  My answer was 
meant to be colorful, but not facetious.  

 

The only god worth having, in  my book, is some sort of an anthropomorphic god. 
 I am pretty sure that no such god exists.  What does exist is a longing in 
people to be held in loving hands and put to a purpose, and they may manifest 
that longing in many ways.  If I care to imagine a Diana-like god as a 
momentary expression of that longing, then I see nothing wrong with that, or 
necessarily facetious about it.  Freud, of course, would love it.  

 

When I am indulging my religious imagination, I generally expend my effort on 
designing the perfect heaven.  Just to reassure you that I am not fooling 
around here, I will quote the ending of my obituary for my brother, written 8 
years ago and spoken before my august, waspish, mostly atheistic family. 

 

I am a life-long Darwinian.  Like Darwin himself, I believe that no-one should 
be denied the comfort of a religious imagination, particularly if she or he 
happens to be an athiest. Even a non-believer should take the time to think 
what heaven might be.  Where will it be?  How old will you be in heaven?  Whom 
will you see there?  Will those people be as you know them now, or as you knew 
them as a child? What season will it be?  What will you wear?

 

For me, heaven will be, a doubles match on the court in Ipswich, my parents, 
family and friends cheering from the shade of the grape arbor, and me, bent to 
the net, with my big brother at the base line behind me, ready to serve.   

 

I think that, right there, is the best of religion,  the comforting 
imagination.  

 

Now, if believing in least action as a fundamental law of nature, as a goal 
that nature is trying to fulfill, gives you that sort of comfort, I am all for 
it.  But I cannot imagine being comforted by that.  Well, I suppose I could 
imagine it like a river, heading toward The Good, and I, lolling in a boat, 
being carried along.  But I think, pretty quick, I would sit up in the boat and 
wonder what this Good Place is  (See the TV series of that name)  No religious 
imagining is going to do me good that isn’t pretty specific.  

 

My own sense of How Things Actually Are is actually pretty unsettling.  As in 
our politics, I imagine two basins of attraction, one, the progressive 
democratic, the other, the autocratic fascist, and a function that goes back 
and forth, going down to the bottom of each basin until it is suddenly flung 
out into the outskirts of the other from which it now descends.  The only 
question is how deep down into our present cesspit we have to go before things 
start to get better.  Is this a 50 year cesspit, or a 400 year one.  

 

 

 

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Stephen Guerin
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 6:53 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Instructional scaffolding - Wikipedia

 

Nick asks: 
| How do you imagine Her. 

I interpret the Archer to be symbolism of an Immanent God in the pantheistic 
tradition of Spinoza and Harold Morowitz. Looking a little into Khalil Gibran, 
he is described as a pantheist and Sufi mystic on Wikipedia 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahlil_Gibran> ..

You've referenced this poem twice now and I was curious what the symbolism was 
for you (Not necessarily if you believe it).

If you want to stick with your original answer, we can return this thread to 
plumbing the semantic depths of "scaffolding" ;-p

 

-Stephen

 

 

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:12 PM <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi, Steve, 

 

She’s about seven feet tall, has two gigantic hounds at her side, wears tall 
boos, short skirt, works out like CRAZY.  When she bends the bow, she always 
say, “Easy now.  Relax.  This may stretch a bit.”  Despite this kindly warning, 
I am never ready for the “twang!”

 

How do you imagine Her. 

 

 

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On 
Behalf Of Stephen Guerin
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 5:54 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Instructional scaffolding - Wikipedia

 

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 5:48 PM <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Or as Kahil Gibran once famously said: “You are the bow from which your 
children as arrows fly; let you bending in the hands of The Archer be for joy.”


Nick you turned me on to this poem a couple of weeks ago and I think it's 
beautiful. Who/What do you understand the Archer to be? 


On Children


 <https://poets.org/poet/kahlil-gibran> Kahlil Gibran - 1883-1931

And a woman who held a babe against her bosom said, Speak to us of Children.
     And he said:
     Your children are not your children.
     They are the sons and daughters of Life’s longing for itself.
     They come through you but not from you,
     And though they are with you yet they belong not to you.

     You may give them your love but not your thoughts,
     For they have their own thoughts.
     You may house their bodies but not their souls,
     For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, 
not even in your dreams.
     You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you.
     For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.
     You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
     The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you 
with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.
     Let your bending in the archer’s hand be for gladness;
     For even as He loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that 
is stable.

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to