I was made to take piano lessons for five years.  I did minimal practice, but 
still hated it and the idea of it.  I can’t do it all now, and don’t wish I 
could.   Don’t tell me what is important.  I will prioritize what I want.

That said, a vaccine is passive and takes no attention.

> On Sep 1, 2021, at 7:29 AM, uǝlƃ ☤>$ <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> UK judge orders rightwing extremist to read classic literature or face prison
> https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/sep/01/judge-orders-rightwing-extremist-to-read-classic-literature-or-face-prison
> 
> I know several liberals who agree with the righties that vaccine and mask 
> mandates are bad, though not for the same reasons. Righties yap about fascism 
> and limits to their "freedom". But the liberals talk about how mandates just 
> push the righties further into their foxholes, preventing collegial 
> conversation.
> 
> So the story above is an interesting situation in similar style. Renee', to 
> this day, hates Shakespeare because she was forced to memorize Romeo and 
> Juliet as a kid. Of course, she doesn't hate Shakespeare, because she hasn't 
> read much Shakespeare. She just *thinks* she hates it because of this 
> "mandate" she suffered under. This court mandated "literature therapy" being 
> imposed on this kid could work, if he can read it sympathetically. But if he 
> can't, if he simply reads it "syntactically", what will he learn?
> 
> BC Smith, in his book "The Promise of AI", channels Steels & Brooks [ψ] in 
> writing:
> 
> "What does all this mean in the case of AIs and computer systems generally? 
> Perhaps at least this: that it is hard to see how synthetic systems could be 
> trained in the ways of judgment except by gradually, incrementally, and 
> systematically enmeshed in normative practices that engage with the world and 
> that involve thick engagement with teachers ('elders'), who can steadily 
> develop and inculcate not just 'moral sensibility' but also intellectual 
> appreciation of intentional commitment to the world."
> 
> If we think of this kid, Ben John, as an AI, what will he learn by mandating 
> he read Dickens? Similarly, what are the mandate protesters learning from our 
> mandates? Stupidity should be painful. And the court's reaction to this kid's 
> stupidity, the pain of reading Pride and Prejudice, should teach that kid 
> something. But which is the more dangerous stupidity? Which stupidity runs 
> the risk of a more catastrophic outcome? Avoiding the vaccine? Or mandating 
> vaccination?
> 
> 
> [ψ] https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351001885
> 
> -- 
> ☤>$ uǝlƃ
> 
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to