Cody-

thanks for pointing that out...   I wonder at his contribution to the book.  The Goodreads reviews are categorically dismissive of the writing and structure of the book, as if someone threw together the maunderings of these three men, each with their own stake in "deep thinking".   I was surprised to see Kissinger listed as an author and I am interested in the specific take on this topic which his unique history offers.

For many (including me I suppose), he still has Nixon cooties on him, but his bona fides as a young man coming of age in Nazi Germany in a Jewish family and community, then emigrating to the US, becoming a US Army infantry and intelligence soldier including action at the Battle of the Bulge ( I just left a week vacationing in that area along the FR/BE border).  He was also given significant roles in the denazification efforts in Germany following their surrender.  Despite my bias against his Nixonian/Republican politics, history and time have caste his works in a better light than I expected it to.   I have not read his primary work but have had plenty of it summarized and quoted to me over my lifetime.

On reflection of what he "might" have to offer on such a topic, I believe that AI will (continue to) bubble up from the bottom/tactics (smarter and smarter appliances and devices and networks/IOT of them) and down from the top/strategy (politics, business, industry) and his geopolitical perspective on the past 100 years  or more (his earliest scholarly being historical reflections from the vantage point of post-WWII.

I keep looking for signs that an AI overlord is pulling the strings of Trump and Musk and Putin and who knows who else whose "contribution" to the international milieu is so disruptive (and not in an obviously *good* way).   <bwahahahaha!>

- Steve

On 6/10/22 10:04 PM, cody dooderson wrote:
The most convincing evidence that I have of the coming AI singularity is Github Copilot. I just wanted to point out that the book "The Age of AI", mentioned earlier, was written by the Henry Kissinger, who was influential in American cold war politics.
Cody Smith


On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 7:54 AM glen <[email protected]> wrote:

    Although it seems like Jochen bent the thread, the question of
    *where* the I is in Strong AI is very much on the topic of the
    localhost. While the OP was really only about *developing* on
    localhost, our questions about artificial general intelligence
    are, really, about the different competencies between man and
    machine. Or, to avoid speciism, animal and machine.

    I tend to think animals are much more like plants than most people
    seem to think. Our intelligence isn't in our brain. And recreating
    the brain and expecting intelligence to pop out is Cargo Cult
    thinking. The localhost post was about the difference between
    algorithms and interactive computing processes, HCI. Plants are
    more obviously non-algorithmic interactive processes than animals
    with a CNS and a brain. And the route to AGI will have to go
    through artificial plants.

    And that requires us to think clearly about *where* the
    interaction takes place.

    On 6/9/22 13:09, Jochen Fromm wrote:
    > Another rant of the type "<x> is dead, long live <y>" where x is
    localhost and y is - the mainframe terminal. There is nothing new
    under the sun. Is this all Silicon Valley has to offer? Bitcoin,
    Blockchain, and the good old mainframe terminal.
    >
    > I have the feeling that all basic application types have already
    been written. Maybe Quantum Computing will bring something new. I
    am sceptical though if it is possible at all.
    > https://www.oreilly.com/radar/quantum-computing-without-the-hype/
    >
    > Strong AI will certainly come. Robots that are as intelligent
    (and/or confused) as we are. And more. In a sense AI and Quantum
    Computing are opposites: for AI we are sure that it will come, but
    we are not sure how we will use it. For quantum computing we are
    not sure if it will come at all, but we know how we would use it.
    > https://ageofaibook.com/
    >
    > -J.
    >
    >
    > -------- Original message --------
    > From: glen <[email protected]>
    > Date: 6/9/22 15:50 (GMT+01:00)
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: [FRIAM] edgelords
    >
    > The End of Localhost
    >
    https://dx.tips/the-end-of-localhost#heading-the-potential-of-edge-compute
    >
    > On the tails of the Get off my lawn! AOL thread, that localhost
    article reminded me of Firefox's new tool:
    >
    > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firefox-translations/
    >
    > I don't yet understand how it works. But assuming it's true, I
    like the idea that the translator robot runs on localhost. But it
    also invokes 2 problems I currently have: 1) coworkers who won't
    share their premature/broken works in progress and 2) the opacity
    of computation that happens elsewhere. If you read the Hacker News
    thread <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31669762>, you see
    lots of yapping about "developers" and front-end stuff, not
    understanding back-end stuff, yaddayadda. And that's fine;
    gatekeepers are everywhere. But there are serious "openness"
    issues with relying on compute elsewhere. And it's not merely
    supply chain problems like what version are they running back
    there. One data portal my clients want/expect me to use prevents
    any traffic in or out, for data privacy reasons. But many of the
    workflows we use to knead data call out to online APIs, in my case
    so that you "don't have to worry about" what version of whatever
    lies on the other side. So,
    > obviously, I have to convert all the outreach to localhost,
    either with simulated servers or installing large blocks into the
    container and refactoring network calls into local calls. That
    bloats my container, of course, slowing the development process.
    Well-simulated data becomes important so I can tighten the dev
    loop on localhost before sending the bloated container to the
    portal to test on real data.
    >
    > I'm no longer sure where I'm going with this. Sorry. Were I
    intelligent, I'd delete my commentary and just send along the
    links. Maybe SteveS has finally infected me. 8^D


-- ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

    -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
    https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
    to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:  5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xFD82820D1AAECDAE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to