This prompt reminds me of the recent book from Matt Strassler named "Waves in 
an Impossible Sea: How Everyday Life Emerges from the Cosmic Ocean". It sounds 
interesting but they don't have it in the libraries here yet and the hardcover 
is too expensive.https://www.harvard.com/book/waves_in_an_impossible_sea/-J.
-------- Original message --------From: glen <[email protected]> Date: 
5/30/24  7:00 PM  (GMT+01:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [FRIAM] words 
Hm. I suppose it's worth a shot. If we prompt with "All energy in the universe 
is expressed in motion. All motion is expressed in waves. All waves are curved. 
So where do the straight lines come from to make the Platonic solids?" Then 
it's possible the LLM would complete that with "There are no straight lines. So 
when I took the flower of life and opened it properly, I found all new wave 
conjugations that expose the in-between spaces. It's the thing that holds us 
all together." But I sincerely doubt it.But maybe by "have to have", you mean 
that an LLM *could* be trained (and/or structured) to bias toward rare 
expressions/concepts in its training set instead of more common ones.On 5/30/24 
09:01, Marcus Daniels wrote:> I'm not going to watch Joe Rogan, 😊 but I think 
LLMs don't have to have this homogenous mean problem.  They capture a 
distribution, so it is a question of the inference procedure to sample from it. 
 What is the (beam) search algorithm, how deep does it go, and what is the 
sampling temperature.> > -----Original Message-----> From: Friam 
<[email protected]> On Behalf Of glen> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 
1:09 PM> To: [email protected]> Subject: [FRIAM] words> > Terrence Howard | 
Full Address and Q&A | Oxford Union 
https://youtu.be/ca1vIYmGyYA?si=vhbtA5WUX1CV8LZH> > Joe Rogan Experience #2152 
- Terrence Howard> https://youtu.be/g197xdRZsW0?si=kFTa7lQJI1lKA6R1> > I just 
can't help but wonder how many people, while listening to Howard talk, realize 
they're interacting with a sick individual (who deserves compassion but does 
not deserve gullibility). Or how many people are (like Rogan seems to have 
been) ... uh ... hypnotized by Howard's well-crafted word salad. In this LLM 
era, where many people, including some on this list, are enthralled by random 
bullshit, it seems like a reasonable thing to wonder about. Luckily, the clear 
cognitive power Howard exhibits puts him in some kind of rare quantile. So our 
LLMs, being driven mostly to a homogenous mean, their random bullshit will, by 
definition, match those of us within 1 or a few sigma and suppress the weirdest 
among us.> > Being a fan of steel-manning, I'm having a bit of a crisis. The 
paradox of tolerance tells me that we absolutely must call bullshit at some 
point, even if it's not ruthless. Those Oxford Union attendees danced around 
egging him on and calling him out. Is this what the kids call "cringe"? Do we 
just cringe and tolerate it? Or, like Rogan, pretend to credibility relying on 
his weirdness to be so weird that it'll disappear into the tails? Or should we 
be deplatforming the bullshit?> -- ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ 
ꙮ-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .FRIAM 
Applied Complexity Group listservFridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   
Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriamto (un)subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comFRIAM-COMIC 
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/archives:  5/2017 thru present 
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/  1/2003 thru 6/2021  
http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to