Huh, Claude just implemented the optimal strategy to Nim and ran in it its 
analysis tool (the Javascript engine on my browser).


From: Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of Roger Critchlow 
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 at 11:36 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] genai and critical thinking 




On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:15 AM Marcus Daniels <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: 

[...] the evolving code itself -- code that can have informative types and even 
carry proofs. The weirdest thing about using AI is that it has no opinions. 
Claude will rewrite code without asking (seemingly having no self-control), but 
it will not confront you like a frustrated colleague might. It is happy to let 
you make a mess provided its sense of idiomatic code patterns are satisfied. 





This echoed something an old boss wrote me today: 



I have much enjoyment torturing llms. I can get off the rails rather easily. 
They have no state, by themselves they cannot calculate parity or play nim 
perfectly. 


Or one might say, they have no purpose. 



-- rec -- 




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to