Nick -

I'm surprised you gave over to ALL-CAPS to distinguish your words from others... it was shockingly difficult or me to read through carefully...  some call this "shouting" which is part of the effect to me also, but more key is the typography and readability of it...

That said, I did what I had to to make it "parseable" with my own sensoria/sensibilities and found it to be quite rich epistemically.

I share your apprehension/feeling/sensibilities on the topic — that entropy (or motive, or any number of these second-order constructs) gets misrepresented when we try to pin it to an instant, as if we could find it /in/ the moment instead of across the differential.

Your “Newliebzian category error” notion made me smile - there’s something compelling about how we keep building our most useful tools from fictions we then forget are fictions. Even that might be too conventient? It might be a kind of necessary fold in how cognition works - using what’s locally graspable to navigate what’s only ever apparent in change or flow. There is a larger insight I think about metaphor in general, but in this case time/causally grounded metaphorical target domains?

I also appreciate your connection to how motives are misread — interiorized and moment-bound when really they emerge from comparative arcs of behaviour. That strikes me as roughly what the nervous system does: extract regularities from dynamics, then offer up something /like/ a motive as a usable handle. Induction is fallible, but it’s also our only working interface. Not because it guarantees truth, but because it lets us stay involved.

In that light, entropy - or motive - might be less about what /is/, and more about what is /minimally sufficient to expect/? From a free energy perspective, the nervous system isn't trying to uncover objective causes but to *minimize surprise* through actionable pattern recognition - constructing motives, like entropy, as provisional summaries of systemic change. It isn’t so much that they’re true, but that they *reduce the expected divergence* between model and world just enough to stay viable?

Fascinating that this iterative/parallel /satisficing/ seems to converge on something yet more absolute (objective truth)?  Is this what Transformers (for the ML wonks in the crowd) do?

- Steve

On 6/16/25 10:38 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
HERE IS A THE PARADOX AS I NOW UNDERSTAND IT.  IS ENTROPY A STATE VARIABLE/  WELL, YES AND NO.  IT IS NOT IN THE SENSE THAT YOU CANNOT CALCULATE IT FROM INSTANTANEOUS STATE VARIABLES, IN PERHAPS THE WAY THAT YOU CANNOT CALCULATE ACCELERATION FROM AN INSTANTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF LOCATION AND VELOCITY.  ACCELERATION AT INSTANT IS A CATEGORY ERROR, A MATHEMATICAL FICTION.  BUT, STRANGE TO DISCOVER, THAT ALL PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS, BEGINNING WITH THE MATHEMATICAL LINE, PERHAPS, IS THE RESULT OF THE EXPLOITATION OF SUCH FICTIONS.   fOR THE MOMENT LETS CALL THEM NEWLIEBZIAN CATEGORY ERRORS.  iF MY CURRENT INTUITION IS CORRECT AND ENTROPY IS NEWLIEBZIAN CATEGORY ERROR, THEN IT FOLLOWS THAT THE REASON i AM CONFUSED BY IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE KEEP ATTRIBUTING IT TO INSTANTS AND PLACES WHEN IT KNOWN THROUGH THE COMPARISON OF DYNAMICS AND ARRAYS.  BEWARE BECAUSE THIS IS A VERY FAMILIAR CONFUSION TO ME, BETWEEN MOTIVES, WHICH ARE THOUGHT OF INTERIOR INSTANTS, WHEN THEY ARE ACTUALLY KNOWN THROUGH THE COMPARISON OF DYNAMICS AND ARRAYS OF BEHAVIOR.   THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF OUR NERVOUS SYSTEM (THE STUFF IN SIDE)  IS TO MAKE COMPUTATIONS BASED ON THE DYNAMICS AND ARRAYS OF BEHAVIOR AND APPLY THEM TO THE NEXT APPLICABLE INSTANT.  PHILOSOPHERS CAN SAY ALL THE WANT ABOUT THE FALLIBILITY OF INDUCTION, BUT IT IS ALL WE GOT.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xD5BAF94F88AFFA63.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to